OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
topicmaps-comment
413 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
Elist Home
Match ALL words
Match ANY word
Re: [xtm-wg] Simplification and clarification of XTM - Editors please read...
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:50:36 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM 1.0 Online Documents
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:08:17 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM 1.0 Online Documents
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 1 Dec 2000 04:49:39 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Simplification and clarification of XTM - Editors please read...
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Fri, 1 Dec 2000 03:52:43 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM copyright
From
"Mason, James (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:40:57 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Simplification and clarification of XTM - Editors please read...
From
luisjm@luisjm.com on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 21:42:43 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM copyright
From
Dale Hunscher <dale@supportability.com> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 21:10:27 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Simplification and clarification of XTM - Editors please read...
From
"ann.wrightson" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 21:05:31 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Simplification and clarification of XTM - Editors please read...
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:19:39 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Simplification and clarification of XTM - Editors please read...
From
"Luis J. Martinez" <luisjm@luisjm.com> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 19:57:25 +0100
[xtm-wg] Getting start
From
"Luiz Antonio" <luiz@supersoft.com.br> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:43:45 +0100
[xtm-wg] GCA/IDEAlliance Member Reception Invitation
From
pconn@gca.org on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:11:38 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM copyright
From
"Jason Markos" <jsm@empolis.co.uk> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:09:25 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM copyright
From
Dale Hunscher <dale@supportability.com> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:49:26 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM copyright
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:40:36 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: Update to XTM 1.0 Spec and DTD
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:39:32 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM copyright
From
"Bernard Vatant" <b.vatant@wanadoo.fr> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:33:01 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: update of XTM repository (new proc model draft; final 1.0 DTD)
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 02:22:37 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Email address
From
"ann.wrightson" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 20:34:53 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Simplification and clarification of XTM - Editors please read...
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 15:55:16 +0100
[xtm-wg] Email address
From
"Wrightson, Ann" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 13:40:55 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: XTM 1.0 Spec Accessibility Features
From
"Wrightson, Ann" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 13:39:36 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Simplification and clarification of XTM - Editors please read...
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:26:56 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] URL for XTM 1.0 Spec (Was: ANNOUNCE: xslt 4 tm 2 xtm)
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 03:10:56 +0100
[xtm-wg] URL for XTM 1.0 Spec (Was: ANNOUNCE: xslt 4 tm 2 xtm)
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 01:17:05 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM 1.0 Spec Accessibility Features
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:40:16 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Comments on the syntax proposal
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 28 Nov 2000 19:43:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Comments on the syntax proposal
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:24:48 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] example xml topic maps sought for testing
From
"Benedicte Le Grand" <Benedicte.Le-Grand@lip6.fr> on Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:16:16 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] example xml topic maps sought for testing
From
mahendra@alberg.stph.net on Tue, 28 Nov 2000 05:38:20 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: xslt 4 tm 2 xtm
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Tue, 28 Nov 2000 04:12:04 +0100
[xtm-wg] Fwd: Re: Use of shakespeare.org in a specification
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 28 Nov 2000 01:15:21 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] example xml topic maps sought for testing
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Mon, 27 Nov 2000 23:46:36 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] example xml topic maps sought for testing
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 27 Nov 2000 19:49:44 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Reminder about submissions for the KT2001 Conference
From
"Dale Hunscher" <dale@supportability.com> on Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:59:16 +0100
[xtm-wg] example xml topic maps sought for testing
From
"Benedicte Le Grand" <Benedicte.Le-Grand@lip6.fr> on Mon, 27 Nov 2000 13:26:37 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Volunteer(s) sought for XTM DTD testing
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Mon, 27 Nov 2000 02:12:30 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Volunteer(s) sought for XTM DTD testing
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 27 Nov 2000 01:02:46 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Volunteer(s) sought for XTM DTD testing
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:56:47 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Reminder about submissions for the KT2001 Conference
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:24:07 +0100
[xtm-wg] Volunteer(s) sought for XTM DTD testing
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:20:13 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Maps product demos at XML 2000
From
sgmldk@aol.com on Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:23:13 +0100
[xtm-wg] Reminder about submissions for the KT2001 Conference
From
sgmldk@aol.com on Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:00:13 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: first posting of TopicMaps.Org home page
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sun, 26 Nov 2000 03:45:00 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Logo Vote Tally (Was: XTM logo)
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sat, 25 Nov 2000 23:29:53 +0100
[xtm-wg] Your advertising rates
From
"Purchasing" <adsearch1@unbounded.com> on Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:53:16 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM Tag Line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Fri, 24 Nov 2000 01:32:29 +0100
[xtm-wg] Late tag line suggestion: Piloting the web
From
"G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@cranesoftwrights.com> on Thu, 23 Nov 2000 23:06:43 +0100
[xtm-wg] Te envio la información !!!
From
"Yolanda Xaravia" <yolandaX@bigfoot.com> on Thu, 23 Nov 2000 22:44:30 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Paris meeting january 19, 20, 21
From
Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu> on Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:11:56 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] new XTM 1.0 DTD- editing error
From
Sengor "Altýngovde" <altngovde@yahoo.com> on Thu, 23 Nov 2000 05:35:21 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: update to XTM repository (new XTM 1.0 DTD; update to proto-spec)
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 23 Nov 2000 02:49:30 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] What we must do to meet the 12/4 date
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 21:19:07 +0100
[xtm-wg] What we must do to meet the 12/4 date
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 20:55:08 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: VOTE: non-Florida-like vote for XTM logo
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 20:48:30 +0100
[xtm-wg] motion results - tag line
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 20:37:06 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: VOTE: non-Florida-like vote for XTM logo
From
pconn@gca.org on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 20:33:59 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM Tag Line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 20:22:54 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM Tag Line
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 19:20:58 +0100
[xtm-wg] Topic Maps product demos at XML 2000
From
pconn@gca.org on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 18:56:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] Decision time
From
pconn@gca.org on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 18:29:40 +0100
[xtm-wg] VOTE: non-Florida-like vote for XTM logo
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:58:02 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Comments on the syntax proposal
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 16:57:24 +0100
[xtm-wg] FW: SUO: Context
From
"Mason, James (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 15:48:55 +0100
[xtm-wg] GPS : unique thought strikes back ?
From
"Bernard Vatant" <b.vatant@wanadoo.fr> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:41:45 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: update to XTM repository home page (new temporary DTD; link fix)
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 03:56:59 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM logo
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 02:25:16 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM Tag Line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:18:30 +0100
[xtm-wg] Advisory poll for taglines
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:18:22 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM Tag Line
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 23:21:56 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM Tag Line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 23:18:15 +0100
UPDATE: [xtm-wg] Poll results for xtm-wg
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 23:06:54 +0100
[xtm-wg] New poll for xtm-wg
From
xtm-wg@egroups.com on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 23:05:55 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Comments on the syntax proposal
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 21:15:33 +0100
[xtm-wg] Invalid Poll
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 21:04:13 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM logo
From
"Jason Markos" <jsm@empolis.co.uk> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 21:03:49 +0100
[xtm-wg] syntax issues: variant name and base name
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:45:06 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The GPS of the Web
From
Charles F. Goldfarb <Charles@XMLbooks.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:35:06 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Notes of MARKETING committee teleconference
From
Adrian Rivers <adrian.rivers@rivcom.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:19:00 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Poll results for xtm-wg
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:07:37 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] RE: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 19:50:11 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Poll results for xtm-wg
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 19:49:53 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Better metaphor than GPS
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 19:44:52 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Poll results for xtm-wg
From
Mark Szpakowski <szpak@well.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 19:40:50 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Better metaphor than GPS
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 19:39:41 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] New poll for xtm-wg
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 19:15:54 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 19:14:48 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Poll results for xtm-wg
From
"Mason, James (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 19:14:18 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Poll results for xtm-wg
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:56:34 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Poll results for xtm-wg
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:50:12 +0100
[xtm-wg] Ontopia's free software
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:41:55 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Poll results for xtm-wg
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:38:52 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] TopicMaps.org marketing tag-line poll results
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:20:05 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Poll results for xtm-wg
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:17:50 +0100
[xtm-wg] New poll for xtm-wg
From
xtm-wg@egroups.com on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:10:33 +0100
[xtm-wg] TopicMaps.org marketing tag-line poll results
From
pconn@gca.org on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:07:56 +0100
[xtm-wg] Poll results for xtm-wg
From
xtm-wg@egroups.com on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:06:06 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Comments on the syntax proposal
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:03:23 +0100
[xtm-wg] The GPS of the Web
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:41:57 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Better metaphor than GPS
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:13:43 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] tag line: the GPS metaphor and other metaphors
From
"Mason, James (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:08:30 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Better metaphor than GPS
From
Adrian Rivers <adrian.rivers@rivcom.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:44:10 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] RE: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:40:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Better metaphor than GPS
From
"Victoria T. Newcomb" <vtn@coolheads.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:12:14 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] RE: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:00:45 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM tag line
From
Adrian Rivers <adrian.rivers@rivcom.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 12:07:20 +0100
[xtm-wg] Conceptual model - Last opportunity for comment from CMS members
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 11:01:15 +0100
[xtm-wg] Better metaphor than GPS
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:40:47 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] RE: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 09:56:45 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 09:13:19 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] tag line: the GPS metaphor and other metaphors
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 02:02:46 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] tag line: the GPS metaphor and other metaphors
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 01:34:28 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] RE: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 01:30:12 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] New suggestion
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 01:30:06 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] tag line: the GPS metaphor and other metaphors
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 01:28:14 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] tag line: the GPS metaphor and other metaphors
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 01:24:28 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] tag line: the GPS metaphor and other metaphors
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 01:19:26 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 01:14:21 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Pam Gennusa" <pam@gennusa.u-net.com> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:47:31 +0100
[xtm-wg] tag line: the GPS metaphor and other metaphors
From
Jim Farrugia <jim@spatial.maine.edu> on Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:00:19 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] New poll for xtm-wg
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 23:15:26 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] New poll for xtm-wg
From
"Mason, James (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 21:59:59 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 21:27:41 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 21:19:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
<guy.a.lukes@frb.gov> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 21:16:14 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
<guy.a.lukes@frb.gov> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 21:00:24 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] New poll for xtm-wg
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 21:00:20 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] New poll for xtm-wg
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:55:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
<guy.a.lukes@frb.gov> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:49:22 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Dan Brickley <daniel.brickley@bristol.ac.uk> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:47:55 +0100
[xtm-wg] New poll for xtm-wg
From
xtm-wg@egroups.com on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:38:21 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:32:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:08:36 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Robert A. Powell" <rpowell@etesters.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:54:27 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] RE: XTM-WG and tag line - weaving the web
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:45:36 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Mark Szpakowski" <szpak@well.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:39:23 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] RE: XTM-WG and tag line - weaving the web
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:27:23 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
pconn@gca.org on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:16:53 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:11:40 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:07:57 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Mason, James (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:00:34 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] RE: XTM-WG and tag line - weaving the web
From
sgmldk@aol.com on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 18:56:00 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 18:52:45 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 18:30:54 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 18:11:41 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FW: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:08:03 +0100
[xtm-wg] Comments on the syntax proposal
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@ontopia.net> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:03:53 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] FW: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Mason, James (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:24:26 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FW: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:19:22 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:17:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:16:27 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] RE: XTM-WG and tag line - weaving the web
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:10:35 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:03:53 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
pconn@gca.org on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 14:59:35 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] FW: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 14:12:46 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: XTM-WG and tag line - weaving the web
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:10:32 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:43:46 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:43:44 +0100
[xtm-wg] Conceptual Model description, work in progress
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 10:57:43 +0100
[xtm-wg] TM Conceptual Model: Semantics of the UML "modern dinosaur"?
From
Alexander Sigel <sigel@bonn.iz-soz.de> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 10:55:28 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM Paris meeting january 19, 20, 21
From
"Benedicte Le Grand" <Benedicte.Le-Grand@lip6.fr> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 10:21:32 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FW: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"ann.wrightson" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 10:18:01 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Sun, 19 Nov 2000 23:32:22 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu> on Sun, 19 Nov 2000 15:59:52 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Sun, 19 Nov 2000 07:36:31 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Bernard Vatant" <b.vatant@wanadoo.fr> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 22:50:25 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FW: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 21:58:25 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 21:45:36 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 21:07:28 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 21:07:22 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 08:12:08 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] FW: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 04:10:13 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 02:05:23 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Jim Farrugia <jim@spatial.maine.edu> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 02:04:17 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FW: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 01:14:03 +0100
[xtm-wg] TR: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 00:21:46 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 23:09:27 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] UML-readers and DTD-readers
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 23:01:11 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 23:00:04 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 22:55:27 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
"Mason, James (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 22:55:02 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 22:50:25 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 22:31:49 +0100
[xtm-wg] FW: [xtm-mktg] Re: XTM tag line
From
pconn@gca.org on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 22:26:39 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 22:18:59 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 22:15:43 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM tag line
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 22:07:59 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] DTD XLink thought
From
"ann.wrightson" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 21:36:00 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:57:39 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Linear Topic Map notation
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:41:53 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Linear Topic Map notation
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:37:50 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:11:32 +0100
[xtm-wg] Towards XTM 2.0
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 17:57:49 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Linear Topic Map notation
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:53:58 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:23:59 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:23:56 +0100
[xtm-wg] referents, subjectRef and subjectDescriptorRef
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:02:58 +0100
[xtm-wg] v1.14 occurrence and subject collision
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 05:57:42 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: update of XTM repository home page (new DTD, new spec, links)
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 04:37:48 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] DTD XLink thought
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 03:07:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] DTD XLink thought
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 02:47:28 +0100
[xtm-wg] UML-readers and DTD-readers
From
Ryan Shaw <ryan@silveregg.co.jp> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 01:56:09 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 01:31:12 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 01:25:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 01:11:48 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:50:36 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Notes of MARKETING committee teleconference
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:41:28 +0100
[xtm-wg] New poll for xtm-wg
From
xtm-wg@egroups.com on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 21:53:45 +0100
[xtm-wg] New poll for xtm-wg
From
xtm-wg@egroups.com on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 21:49:33 +0100
[xtm-wg] Conceptual model, and formal semantics for TMs
From
"ann.wrightson" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 21:37:27 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Identified Objects vs Conceptual Subjects [Re : Formal semantics ...]
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 21:28:31 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Identified Objects vs Conceptual Subjects [Re : Formal semantics ...]
From
"ann.wrightson" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 21:05:54 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: [xtm-mktg] Notes of MARKETING committee teleconference
From
"Pam Gennusa" <pam@gennusa.u-net.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:59:22 +0100
[xtm-wg] Notes of MARKETING committee teleconference
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:35:49 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Linear Topic Map notation
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 18:48:14 +0100
[xtm-wg] Plus ca change...
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 18:26:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:59:08 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:54:36 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:25:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:25:28 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:57:11 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Paris meeting january 19, 20, 21
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:57:05 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:27:56 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 13:31:40 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] DTD issues
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 13:00:50 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] DTD XLink thought
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:29:10 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] DTD issues
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:23:05 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 11:35:04 +0100
[xtm-wg] The Linear Topic Map notation
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 10:08:32 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:54:14 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:34:25 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 08:50:01 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 03:56:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 03:45:48 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Paris meeting january 19, 20, 21
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 02:10:28 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Paris meeting january 19, 20, 21
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 23:09:21 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] publication strategy for the XTM brand
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:35:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Again: How might we tie more formal semantics to TMs?
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:56:43 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Again: How might we tie more formal semantics to TMs?
From
<guy.a.lukes@frb.gov> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:50:42 +0100
[xtm-wg] Identified Objects vs Conceptual Subjects [Re : Formal semantics ...]
From
"Bernard Vatant" <b.vatant@wanadoo.fr> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 10:51:55 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: Reification of topic map constructs
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 09:49:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] draft incomplete minutes of Dallas meeting
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 06:16:39 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Correction to the minutes for Swindon
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 06:16:36 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: update of XTM 0.9 DTD and 0.9 specification
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 01:17:11 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Again: How might we tie more formal semantics to TMs?
From
Alexander Sigel <sigel@bonn.iz-soz.de> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 01:00:50 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: update of XTM 0.9 DTD
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 00:46:39 +0100
[xtm-wg] Correction to the minutes for Swindon
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 00:17:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Again: How might we tie more formal semantics to TMs?
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:51:51 +0100
[xtm-wg] Integrating prose for model and markup in the spec
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:14:05 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: Reification of topic map constructs
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:39:09 +0100
Re: "the graph" WAS RE: [xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:30:57 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Commitee work in Dallas
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 20:53:17 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Again: How might we tie more formal semantics to TMs?
From
"ann.wrightson" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:41:04 +0100
[xtm-wg] Support the XTM Marketing Activities by Becoming an XTM Founding Marketing Spons
From
"Dianne Kennedy" <kennedy@xmlxperts.com> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:49:53 +0100
[xtm-wg] Again: How might we tie more formal semantics to TMs?
From
Alexander Sigel <sigel@bonn.iz-soz.de> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:38:15 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Re: Reification of topic map constructs
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:16:31 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Reification of topic map constructs
From
"Lars Marius Garshol" <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:19:27 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
"Lars Marius Garshol" <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:58:34 +0100
[xtm-wg] MARKETING: Call for Participation!
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 06:34:14 +0100
[xtm-wg] Contributing papers on "the semantic web"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 13 Nov 2000 22:42:14 +0100
[xtm-wg] publication strategy for the XTM brand
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 13 Nov 2000 19:47:32 +0100
"closure" WAS RE: [xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 13 Nov 2000 19:11:46 +0100
"the graph" WAS RE: [xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:52:38 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Commitee work in Dallas
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:41:46 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Commitee work in Dallas
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:39:02 +0100
[xtm-wg] Commitee work in Dallas
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:15:22 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] From the peanut gallery to the modeling group
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Fri, 10 Nov 2000 17:45:12 +0100
[xtm-wg] Subjects and occurrences (Re: "subject-descriptor-ness")
From
"Bernard Vatant" <b.vatant@wanadoo.fr> on Fri, 10 Nov 2000 14:27:19 +0100
[xtm-wg] Good luck to all in Dallas!
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:56:23 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:13:23 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository Site (new XTM DTD, UML Primer)
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 21:40:36 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] From the peanut gallery to the modeling group
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 20:46:42 +0100
RE: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a T M yield one graph, or several?)
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 18:09:36 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 18:03:53 +0100
RE: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a T M yield one graph, or several?)
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:44:08 +0100
RE: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a T M yield one graph, or several?)
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:29:10 +0100
RE: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a TM yield one graph, or several?)
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:05:57 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] From the peanut gallery to the modeling group
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:31:14 +0100
RE: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a T M yield one graph, or several?)
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:31:02 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:29:48 +0100
RE: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a TM yield one graph, or several?)
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:29:36 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] "subject-descriptor-ness" scoping topic
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:29:35 +0100
RE: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a T M yield one graph, or several?)
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:23:05 +0100
RE: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a T M yield one graph, or several?)
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:57:58 +0100
RE: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a T M yield one graph, or several?)
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:55:00 +0100
Re: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a TM yield one graph, or several?)
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:48:50 +0100
grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a TM yield one graph, or several?)
From
peterj@wrox.com on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 13:05:44 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] "subject-descriptor-ness" scoping topic
From
"ann.wrightson" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 12:25:59 +0100
Re: An occurrence example. (was: Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD))
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 05:40:08 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] "subject-descriptor-ness" scoping topic
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Thu, 9 Nov 2000 05:40:05 +0100
[xtm-wg] TR: FW: Semantic Web Technologies Workshop Agenda
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 23:08:46 +0100
RE: An occurrence example. (was: Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD))
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:08:03 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] "subject-descriptor-ness" scoping topic
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 21:34:58 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 20:53:07 +0100
Re: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a TM yield one graph, or several?)
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 20:27:43 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] From the peanut gallery to the modeling group
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 19:59:32 +0100
grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a TM yield one graph, or several?)
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 19:55:20 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] From the peanut gallery to the modeling group
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@y12.doe.gov> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 19:48:54 +0100
An occurrence example. (was: Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD))
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 19:35:24 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 19:17:11 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 19:13:43 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:58:32 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a TM yield one graph, or several?
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:58:08 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:43:57 +0100
NB on "node" [was Re: [xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs]
From
John Robert Gardner <John.Robert.Gardner@east.sun.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:42:15 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a TM yield one graph, or several?
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:41:31 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] "subject-descriptor-ness" scoping topic
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:21:24 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:21:22 +0100
[xtm-wg] Does processing a TM yield one graph, or several?
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:16:56 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:47:09 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:44:20 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:44:05 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: [XTM-CMS] Is there no data model ?
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:28:21 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:17:57 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: [XTM-CMS] Is there no data model ?
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:01:24 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 12:56:32 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Pete J's alternative xmtdoc packaging proposal
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 12:52:50 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 10:03:48 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:56:14 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:51:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] "subject-descriptor-ness" scoping topic
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 07:08:46 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 06:03:30 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 04:52:22 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: XTM Repository Update 'n Pre-meeting Preparation
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 04:36:37 +0100
[xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 02:14:03 +0100
[xtm-wg] From the peanut gallery to the modeling group
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 01:47:18 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: [XTM-CMS] Is there no data model ?
From
"Bernard Vatant" <b.vatant@wanadoo.fr> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 01:35:28 +0100
RE: [ms@ms.lt: [xtm-wg] Re: Agenda for Dallas]
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 00:44:58 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Peter Newcomb is voted an Invited Guest
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 00:24:52 +0100
[xtm-wg] WORKSHOP SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 00:24:34 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Pete J's alternative xmtdoc packaging proposal
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 00:10:37 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [XTM-CMS] Latest Model
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 00:03:23 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 23:12:08 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 20:09:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] [XTM-CMS] Is there no data model?
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 19:29:23 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 19:14:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 19:12:37 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 19:05:51 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Pete J's alternative xmtdoc packaging proposal
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 19:05:40 +0100
[xtm-wg] Peter Newcomb is voted an Invited Guest
From
"Luis J. Martinez" <luisjm@luisjm.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 19:02:35 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [XTM-ISS] new XTM prototype DTD
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 16:17:35 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [XTM-ISS] new XTM prototype DTD
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:20:20 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [XTM-ISS] new XTM prototype DTD
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:13:33 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [XTM-ISS] new XTM prototype DTD
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:22:19 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [XTM-ISS] new XTM prototype DTD
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 13:59:54 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [XTM-ISS] new XTM prototype DTD
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 13:56:52 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [XTM-ISS] new XTM prototype DTD
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 12:32:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] [XTM-CMS] Is there no data model?
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 11:27:44 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] [XTM-CMS] Is there no data model?
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 10:28:27 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 10:27:42 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Dan Brickley <daniel.brickley@bristol.ac.uk> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 10:12:12 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 10:04:31 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:50:24 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [xtm-cms] Re: Model Issues
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@stepuk.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:49:19 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [xtm-cms] [xtm-ss] DTD for conceptual model
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@stepuk.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:49:19 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [XTM-CMS] [XTM-SS] Point of discussion with Model
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@stepuk.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:38:40 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [XTM-CMS] Latest Model
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@stepuk.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:33:31 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM Repository (new XTM prototype DTD)
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 04:50:25 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Agenda for Dallas
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 01:42:55 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 00:52:13 +0100
Re: [ms@ms.lt: [xtm-wg] Re: Agenda for Dallas]
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 00:12:43 +0100
Re: [ms@ms.lt: [xtm-wg] Re: Agenda for Dallas]
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 7 Nov 2000 00:04:10 +0100
[ms@ms.lt: [xtm-wg] Re: Agenda for Dallas]
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:57:30 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:21:05 +0100
[xtm-wg] A topic map on the web
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:04:48 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Agenda for Dallas
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:02:10 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
"ann.wrightson" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:54:40 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] participation in Dallas meeting
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 18:36:45 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] a get-together of some RDF and TopicMap folks
From
"Miller,Eric" <emiller@oclc.org> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 18:15:35 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] RE: [xtm-mtg] Marketing Committee - who will demo as SID
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:39:37 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] participation in Dallas meeting
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:47:48 +0100
[xtm-wg] An alternative xtmdoc packaging proposal
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 13:25:39 +0100
[xtm-wg] Pete J's alternative xmtdoc packaging proposal
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 13:25:35 +0100
[xtm-wg] New file uploaded to xtm-wg
From
<xtm-wg@egroups.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:48:00 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: [xtm-mtg] Marketing Committee - who will demo as SID
From
"Pam Gennusa" <pam@gennusa.u-net.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:42:23 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] participation in Dallas meeting
From
"Luis J. Martinez" <luisjm@luisjm.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:42:15 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] participation in Dallas meeting
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:09:45 +0100
[xtm-wg] participation in Dallas meeting
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:21:53 +0100
[xtm-wg] FYI: The W3C Semantic Web
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:41:52 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of XTM repository (new link)
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:30:36 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 19:36:16 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 19:20:28 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Dan Brickley <daniel.brickley@bristol.ac.uk> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:44:52 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:33:26 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] [XTM-CMS] Is there no data model?
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:32:10 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:14:25 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] [XTM-CMS] Is there no data model?
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:13:10 +0100
RE:[xtm-wg] Book you recommended
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:31:12 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] [XTM-CMS] Is there no data model?
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:18:05 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Notes of Marketing Committee Teleconference - mondeca product presentation ?
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:09:53 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] [XTM-CMS] Is there no data model?
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:57:57 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@stepuk.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:31:05 +0100
[xtm-wg] [XTM-CMS] Is there no data model?
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:05:59 +0100
[xtm-wg] New eGroup for Marketing Committee
From
pconn@gca.org on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:05:13 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Dynamic Generation and Serving of Topic Maps
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 12:53:55 +0100
[xtm-wg] meeting of XTM authoring group
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 12:12:03 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] [xtm-cms] Re: XML Conceptual Model Report
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@stepuk.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 09:59:24 +0100
[xtm-wg] Agenda for Dallas
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 02:02:38 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] arrangements: meeting of XTM authoring group
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 01:48:36 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] arrangements: meeting of XTM authoring group
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 01:18:10 +0100
[xtm-wg] [xtm-cms] Re: XML Conceptual Model Report
From
"Luis J. Martinez" <luisjm@luisjm.com> on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 00:02:54 +0100
[xtm-wg] Would somebody like to share a room?
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Thu, 2 Nov 2000 23:51:00 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Notes of Marketing Committee Teleconference - mondeca product presentation ?
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Thu, 2 Nov 2000 23:47:08 +0100
[xtm-wg] Notes of Marketing Committee Teleconference
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Thu, 2 Nov 2000 19:19:39 +0100
[xtm-wg] FW: RE: Upper Cyc Ontology as MS Access DB
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@y12.doe.gov> on Thu, 2 Nov 2000 19:03:01 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Marketing phone conference
From
pconn@gca.org on Thu, 2 Nov 2000 15:01:51 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Nature of Things...
From
<guy.a.lukes@frb.gov> on Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:36:35 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Marketing conference call
From
"ramon.vincent" <ramon.vincent@wanadoo.fr> on Thu, 2 Nov 2000 11:49:45 +0100
[xtm-wg] Marketing conference call
From
"Jason Markos" <jsm@empolis.co.uk> on Thu, 2 Nov 2000 11:05:52 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Topic Maps Marketing Committee and Interest Day
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Thu, 2 Nov 2000 00:55:55 +0100
RE: RE: [xtm-wg] Topic Maps Marketing Committee and Interest Day
From
"Ramon VINCENT" <ramon.vincent@mondeca.com> on Thu, 2 Nov 2000 00:49:19 +0100
[xtm-wg] arrangements: meeting of XTM authoring group
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Thu, 2 Nov 2000 00:38:28 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Topic Maps Marketing Committee and Interest Day
From
Adrian Rivers <adrian.rivers@rivcom.com> on Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:48:13 +0100
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.2