OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
topicmaps-comment
276 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
Elist Home
Match ALL words
Match ANY word
Re: [xtm-wg] Common Assumptions
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:33:45 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Texas meeting dates
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:47:33 +0100
[xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision -- PASSED
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:38:28 +0100
[xtm-wg] Apologies
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:08:13 +0100
[xtm-wg] REMOVE
From
Leif Mortenson <leif@silveregg.co.jp> on Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:29:09 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Texas meeting dates
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:54:34 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Common Assumptions
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:50:07 +0100
[xtm-wg] Texas meeting dates
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:40:20 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Common Assumptions
From
"univers immedia" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:23:46 +0100
[xtm-wg] XP serialization, XTM topicmap serialization, RDF.
From
Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> on Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:03:18 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:25:41 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:20:10 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:16:11 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
From
"Mike Geiger" <mike@percurrence.com> on Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:08:12 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Holger Rath, David Steinberg, Laurent Olivry as a gu ests, Austin.
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Tue, 30 Jan 2001 02:16:21 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: Laurent Olivry as a guest, Austin.
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:58:56 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Holger Rath, David Steinberg, Laurent Olivry as a gu ests, Austin.
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:56:59 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Laurent Olivry as a guest, Austin.
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:21:47 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Holger Rath, David Steinberg, Laurent Olivry as a guests, Austin.
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:22:20 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Holger Rath, David Steinberg, Laurent Olivry as a guests, Austin.
From
Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu> on Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:06:26 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Common Assumptions
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:24:24 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Common Assumptions
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:39:13 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Common Assumptions
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:21:40 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Common Assumptions
From
"univers immedia" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:37:34 +0100
[xtm-wg] Common Assumptions [Was: analysis of the meaning of ontology]
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 29 Jan 2001 07:17:50 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: [kmci-Virtual-Chapter] RE: analysis of the meaning of ontology: pdf
From
Joe Firestone <eisai@home.com> on Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:52:13 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] analysis of the meaning of ontology: pdf
From
"Paul Prueitt" <beadmaster@ontologyStream.com> on Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:28:35 +0100
[xtm-wg] analysis of the meaning of ontology
From
"Paul Prueitt" <beadmaster@ontologyStream.com> on Mon, 29 Jan 2001 02:06:54 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification - why it came back in the CM
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:02:04 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Sun, 28 Jan 2001 18:50:33 +0100
[xtm-wg] the forum technology
From
"Paul Prueitt" <beadmaster@ontologyStream.com> on Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:53:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification - why it came back in the CM
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:09:09 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification
From
"univers immedia" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:10:40 +0100
[xtm-wg] egroups engulfed by Yahoo : precisions
From
"univers immedia" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:40:27 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification
From
Dan Brickley <daniel.brickley@bristol.ac.uk> on Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:09:22 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:53:34 +0100
[xtm-wg] Reification
From
"Paul Prueitt" <beadmaster@ontologyStream.com> on Sat, 27 Jan 2001 15:21:56 +0100
[xtm-wg] reification
From
"Paul Prueitt" <beadmaster@ontologyStream.com> on Sat, 27 Jan 2001 15:11:51 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification - why it came back in the CM
From
"univers immedia" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Sat, 27 Jan 2001 12:53:40 +0100
[xtm-wg] egroups engulfed by Yahoo
From
"univers immedia" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Sat, 27 Jan 2001 12:21:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification - why it came back in the CM
From
David Holliday <dholliday007@sprintmail.com> on Sat, 27 Jan 2001 00:57:11 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification - why it came back in the CM
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sat, 27 Jan 2001 00:32:54 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Reification - why it came back in the CM
From
David Holliday <dholliday007@sprintmail.com> on Sat, 27 Jan 2001 00:05:45 +0100
[xtm-wg] Reification - why it came back in the CM
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:35:59 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] relinquishing membership
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Fri, 26 Jan 2001 16:37:53 +0100
[xtm-wg] relinquishing membership
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Fri, 26 Jan 2001 12:48:13 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] xtm.org? Domain for sale?
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 23:19:36 +0100
[xtm-wg] invited guests
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan@globalwisdom.org> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:53:28 +0100
Re: FW: [xtm-wg] RE: Special hotel room fees around KT2001
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 12:27:59 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] xtm.org? Domain for sale?
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 12:27:47 +0100
[xtm-wg] xtm.org? Domain for sale?
From
Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 12:00:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Tr: Semantic Web Agreement Group
From
"univers immedia" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:43:20 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:41:08 +0100
[xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint considered harmful
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:16:20 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Proposal for inviting David Steinberg as a guest.
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:08:15 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: MOTION: Charter revision
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:08:13 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:06:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest at the Texas Meeting
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:03:46 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest at the Texas Meeting
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 05:58:10 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Thu, 25 Jan 2001 05:22:35 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest at the Texas Meeting
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 22:46:58 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Proposal for inviting David Steinberg as a guest.
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 22:32:07 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 22:29:03 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest at the Texas Meeting
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 22:25:56 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Tr: Semantic Web Agreement Group
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 22:04:20 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] David and Laurent
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 22:03:25 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: New appointments for XTM
From
"Jason Markos" <jsm@empolis.co.uk> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:03:04 +0100
[xtm-wg] tmql-wg
From
"ann.wrightson" <ann.wrightson@leedsalumni.org.uk> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:57:02 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Tr: Semantic Web Agreement Group
From
John Robert Gardner <John.Robert.Gardner@east.sun.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:57:32 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: [kmci-Virtual-Chapter] RE: Practical KM
From
"Paul Prueitt" <beadmaster@ontologyStream.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:51:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] TMQL requirements working draft now available
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:36:24 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Tr: Semantic Web Agreement Group
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:18:20 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: [KMIndia] a new bead game
From
"Paul Prueitt" <beadmaster@ontologyStream.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:37:44 +0100
[xtm-wg] Vote "yes" on motion to amend charter
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan@globalwisdom.org> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:31:30 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] David and Laurent
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:48:53 +0100
[xtm-wg] Tr: Semantic Web Agreement Group
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:27:43 +0100
[xtm-wg] David and Laurent
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:19:32 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:11:48 +0100
[xtm-wg] voting on Laurent
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan@globalwisdom.org> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 05:48:27 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 04:11:09 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Processing Model Documents
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 24 Jan 2001 04:03:08 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:35:40 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:17:04 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:15:37 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:51:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:31:36 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:03:51 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:44:03 +0100
[xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:16:55 +0100
[xtm-wg] Knowledge Technologies 2001
From
pconn@gca.org on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:59:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Suggested recommendations for Subject Indicators choice
From
"univers immedia" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:30:14 +0100
[xtm-wg] Processing Model Documents
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:23:45 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Suggested recommendations for Subject Indicators cho ice
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 22 Jan 2001 17:46:03 +0100
RE: W3C status
From
"Jim Stock" <jss@empolis.co.uk> on Mon, 22 Jan 2001 17:45:17 +0100
[xtm-wg] Suggested recommendations for Subject Indicators choice
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:59:57 +0100
[xtm-wg] New XML Portal Site
From
kl_liu@hotmail.com on Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:39:35 +0100
TopicMaps.org status update
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Mon, 22 Jan 2001 10:31:02 +0100
[xtm-wg] Vote yes on Holger Rath
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan@globalwisdom.org> on Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:47:24 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:18:22 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:09:04 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Object Model
From
"Luis J. Martinez" <luisjm@luisjm.com> on Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:06:45 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Re: Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest a t the Texas Meeting
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:14:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Need more votes for inviting new guests
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:10:41 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:07:46 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Comments on XTM Spec 1.0
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:07:30 +0100
[xtm-wg] Conceptual Model - complete version in its current form
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:18:59 +0100
[xtm-wg] Status of the Conceptual Model
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:18:28 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:18:25 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:59:56 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:50:51 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM 1.0 Comments
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:50:50 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] name - occurrence? (food for thought) was: Topic Naming Constraint
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 01:11:05 +0100
[xtm-wg] Laurent Olivry
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:21:11 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
"Mason, James (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:55:26 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:35:19 +0100
[xtm-wg] name - occurrence? (food for thought) was: Topic Naming Constraint
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:50:50 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:40:40 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:28:56 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Mapping of XTM syntax to the Conceptual Model
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:28:55 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Comments on XTM Spec 1.0
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:28:55 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Need more votes for inviting new guests
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:16:19 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Need more votes for inviting new guests
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:37:20 +0100
[xtm-wg] Need more votes for inviting new guests
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:30:29 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest at the Texas Meeting
From
"Andrius Kulikauskas" <ms@ms.lt> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 07:46:53 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 06:25:30 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 04:07:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest at the Texas Meeting
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:48:32 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:40:52 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:30:25 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:24:38 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest at the Texas Meeting
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:19:13 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest at the Texas Meeting
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:40:21 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:13:36 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re : Topic Naming Constraint (again)
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:12:10 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:12:03 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:46:59 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:46:55 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:27:32 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:09:39 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:43:45 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:35:24 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:04:05 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:59:17 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re : Topic Naming Constraint
From
"Bernard Vatant" <bernard@universimmedia.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:40:38 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:32:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
Peter Newcomb <peter@techno.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:16:26 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:50:44 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
Peter Newcomb <peter@techno.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:42:12 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:32:07 +0100
[xtm-wg] Votes on additional invited guests
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:58:36 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:29:19 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:49:03 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:33:17 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:39:28 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:12:19 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:01:46 +0100
[xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:59:00 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:47:25 +0100
[xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:16:43 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Mapping of XTM syntax to the Conceptual Model
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:59:16 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:02:08 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 01:22:04 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:42:37 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
David Holliday <dholliday007@sprintmail.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:10:37 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:08:08 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
David Holliday <dholliday007@sprintmail.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:55:31 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:53:48 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:14:04 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Admitting new members
From
David Holliday <dholliday007@sprintmail.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:12:55 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Our purpose
From
David Holliday <dholliday007@sprintmail.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:57:34 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re : purpose and new members
From
"Bernard Vatant" <bernard@universimmedia.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:50:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:55:44 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:47:40 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:40:54 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:37:23 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Comments on XTM Spec 1.0
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:19:10 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Comments on XTM Spec 1.0
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:11:08 +0100
[xtm-wg] Paris - confirm
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan@globalwisdom.org> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:53:43 +0100
[xtm-wg] universal scope question
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:59:20 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:38:06 +0100
[xtm-wg] Admitting new members
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 07:47:00 +0100
[xtm-wg] Comments on XTM Spec 1.0
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 05:39:37 +0100
[xtm-wg] Our purpose
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 04:24:03 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
David Holliday <dholliday007@sprintmail.com> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 00:25:26 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] TM Conceptual Model: Semantics of the UML "modern dinosaur"?
From
"Luis J. Martinez" <luisjm@luisjm.com> on Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:58:55 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
"Paul Prueitt" <beadmaster@ontologyStream.com> on Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:52:56 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
David Holliday <dholliday007@sprintmail.com> on Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:35:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sat, 13 Jan 2001 22:45:02 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Sat, 13 Jan 2001 00:21:24 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nominations for invited guests
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 23:29:59 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest at the Texas Meeting
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 23:26:54 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] TM Conceptual Model: Semantics of the UML "modern dinosaur"?
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 22:13:13 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] TM Conceptual Model: Semantics of the UML "modern dinosaur"?
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:47:43 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] TM Conceptual Model: Semantics of the UML "modern dinosaur"?
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:09:50 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:06:41 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:04:11 +0100
[xtm-wg] Proposal to invite Laurent as a guest in XTM
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 19:57:46 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] TM Conceptual Model: Semantics of the UML "modern dinosaur"?
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17:33:43 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Comments on XTM Spec 1.0
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@ontopia.net> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:41:45 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] RE: Bernard Vatant now an invited guest to XTM
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 09:23:59 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re : Comments on XTM Spec 1.0
From
"Hans Holger Rath" <hhr@step.de> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 08:27:51 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] TM Conceptual Model: Semantics of the UML "modern dinosaur"?
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 04:30:22 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: Bernard Vatant now an invited guest to XTM
From
"Bernard Vatant" <bernard@universimmedia.com> on Thu, 11 Jan 2001 22:22:34 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re : Comments on XTM Spec 1.0
From
"Bernard Vatant" <bernard@universimmedia.com> on Thu, 11 Jan 2001 22:22:32 +0100
[xtm-wg] TM Conceptual Model: Semantics of the UML "modern dinosaur"?
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:10:00 +0100
[xtm-wg] Comments on XTM Spec 1.0
From
"Hans Holger Rath" <hhr@step.de> on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:40:03 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nominations for invited guests
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:00:51 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest at th e Texas Meeting
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:49:32 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Bernard Vatant now an invited guest to XTM
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:33:33 +0100
[xtm-wg] Bernard Vatant now an invited guest to XTM
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:03:35 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nomination for Holger Rath to be invited guest at the Texas Meeting
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:59:11 +0100
[xtm-wg] Nominations for invited guests
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:40:47 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Paris Meeting - thanks to confirm your participation - Happy Christmas - Jean
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:01:18 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: Mapping document
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:02:32 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] xtm-wg archives available at freelists.org
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 02:08:34 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] freelists archives
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:10:47 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Modified diagram for Association Template
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 22:40:55 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Modified diagram for Association Template
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 21:47:48 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Modified diagram for Association Template
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 20:42:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] freelists archives
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:33:35 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] xtm-wg archives available at freelists.org
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:32:00 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Modified diagram for Association Template
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 14:46:23 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Modified diagram for Association Template
From
"Hans Holger Rath" <hhr@step.de> on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:54:34 +0100
[xtm-wg] Prueitt Introduction
From
beadmaster@ontologyStream.com on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:37:35 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Modified diagram for Association Template
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:02:10 +0100
[xtm-wg] Modified diagram for Association Template
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:37:33 +0100
[xtm-wg] Typo in 1.0 version
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Tue, 9 Jan 2001 03:56:33 +0100
[xtm-wg] freelists archives
From
"Bernard Vatant" <bernard@universimmedia.com> on Mon, 8 Jan 2001 23:26:01 +0100
[xtm-wg] Mapping of XTM syntax to the Conceptual Model
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 8 Jan 2001 20:42:55 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] xtm-wg archives available at freelists.org
From
Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 8 Jan 2001 20:24:35 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Workshops on XTM and Global Knowledge Interchange.
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:53:45 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] xtm-wg archives available at freelists.org
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:27:15 +0100
[xtm-wg] xtm-wg archives available at freelists.org
From
"Bernard Vatant" <bernard@universimmedia.com> on Mon, 8 Jan 2001 10:20:43 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: leaving e-groups
From
Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> on Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:39:48 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Re: leaving e-groups
From
Daniel Koger <dkoger@hdtd.com> on Mon, 8 Jan 2001 07:11:28 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: leaving e-groups
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Mon, 8 Jan 2001 06:57:37 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Re : leaving e-groups
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:20:53 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re : leaving e-groups
From
"Bernard Vatant" <bernard@universimmedia.com> on Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:28:01 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Suggestion for leaving e-groups
From
"G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@cranesoftwrights.com> on Sun, 7 Jan 2001 00:56:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Suggestion for leaving e-groups
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Sat, 6 Jan 2001 23:55:32 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Suggestion for leaving e-groups
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Sat, 6 Jan 2001 21:00:23 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Suggestion for leaving e-groups
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Sat, 6 Jan 2001 20:41:36 +0100
[xtm-wg] Suggestion for leaving e-groups
From
"Bernard Vatant" <b.vatant@wanadoo.fr> on Sat, 6 Jan 2001 13:14:26 +0100
[xtm-wg] Bernard Vatant's nomination
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Fri, 5 Jan 2001 19:52:30 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Issue with instanceOf
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Fri, 5 Jan 2001 19:00:04 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Issue with instanceOf
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Fri, 5 Jan 2001 17:41:39 +0100
[xtm-wg] question about topic merging
From
"Tanguy Coenen" <tanguy.coenen@vub.ac.be> on Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:23:18 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Issue with instanceOf
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Fri, 5 Jan 2001 11:55:21 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Issue with instanceOf
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Thu, 4 Jan 2001 20:17:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Paris Meeting - thanks to confirm your participation - Happy Christmas - Jean
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Thu, 4 Jan 2001 18:55:12 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Paris Meeting - thanks to confirm your participation - Happy Christmas - Jean
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Thu, 4 Jan 2001 18:24:21 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Questions about the Processing Model
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Thu, 4 Jan 2001 17:36:30 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Issue with instanceOf
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Thu, 4 Jan 2001 13:57:07 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Issue with instanceOf
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Thu, 4 Jan 2001 13:50:40 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Issue with instanceOf
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Thu, 4 Jan 2001 13:34:25 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Relativistic views [Re: XTM syntax issues]
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:06:54 +0100
[xtm-wg] Relativistic views [Re: XTM syntax issues]
From
"Bernard Vatant" <bernard@universimmedia.com> on Thu, 4 Jan 2001 00:07:29 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] ?Inference rules in XTM
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 20:20:46 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Paris Meeting - thanks to confirm your participation - Happy Christmas - Jean
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 19:25:03 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Issue with instanceOf
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 19:13:11 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Chris Angus now an Invited Guest to the XTM Authoring Group
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 18:45:35 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Paris Meeting - thanks to confirm your participation - Happy Christmas - Jean
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 18:43:01 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Issue with instanceOf
From
Peter Newcomb <peter@techno.com> on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 18:33:42 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Implementations
From
"Hans Holger Rath" <hhr@step.de> on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 17:28:52 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Re: XTM syntax issues
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:46:06 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Implementations
From
"V.Vasant" <vasant@gdit.iiit.net> on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:14:48 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ?Inference rules in XTM
From
"Hans Holger Rath" <hhr@step.de> on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 15:32:55 +0100
[xtm-wg] Issue with instanceOf
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 15:26:31 +0100
[xtm-wg] ?Inference rules in XTM
From
mgomari@ait.ca on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 15:18:01 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM syntax issues
From
rho@bigpond.net.au on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 01:59:17 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM 1.0 Spec -- Example inconsistencies
From
rho@bigpond.net.au on Wed, 3 Jan 2001 01:36:52 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Chris Angus now an Invited Guest to the XTM Authorin g Group
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 2 Jan 2001 17:45:48 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Chris Angus now an Invited Guest to the XTM Authorin g Group
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 2 Jan 2001 17:25:07 +0100
[xtm-wg] Chris Angus now an Invited Guest to the XTM Authoring Group
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 2 Jan 2001 16:56:02 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Automatic Conceptual Indexing
From
"Hans Holger Rath" <hhr@step.de> on Tue, 2 Jan 2001 10:10:46 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Automatic Conceptual Indexing
From
"Hans Holger Rath" <hhr@step.de> on Tue, 2 Jan 2001 09:58:58 +0100
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.2