OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
topicmaps-comment
261 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
Elist Home
Match ALL words
Match ANY word
RE: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom> on Thu, 1 Mar 2001 00:24:24 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: The Upper Cyc Ontology in XTM (Preliminary)
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:02:28 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: The Upper Cyc Ontology in XTM (Preliminary)
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:11:51 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:55:13 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:51:59 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:11:41 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:47:52 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] sorry cannot attend Austin meeting
From
DAVID_STEINBERG@acdi-cida.gc.ca on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:03:49 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:34:13 +0100
SV: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se> on Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:29:19 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The case against the TNC
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:42:41 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The case against the TNC
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:14:59 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The case against the TNC
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Sun, 25 Feb 2001 13:59:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The case against the TNC
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Sun, 25 Feb 2001 13:42:32 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Template: Mindset
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Sun, 25 Feb 2001 04:37:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The case against the TNC
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Sun, 25 Feb 2001 04:01:47 +0100
[xtm-wg] _Topic Maps for Navigating E-Journals_
From
gerrymck@iastate.edu on Sat, 24 Feb 2001 21:24:02 +0100
[xtm-wg] The case against the TNC
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sat, 24 Feb 2001 19:23:59 +0100
[xtm-wg] Defending the TNC
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Sat, 24 Feb 2001 14:13:09 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Topic Naming Constraint
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Sat, 24 Feb 2001 01:13:40 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Topic Naming Constraint
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sat, 24 Feb 2001 01:05:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Topic Naming Constraint
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Sat, 24 Feb 2001 00:42:10 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Topic Naming Constraint
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 23:48:28 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Topic Naming Constraint
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 20:00:52 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Minutes not trustworthy?
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:41:20 +0100
Re: virus alert(was Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question)
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:37:37 +0100
[xtm-wg] Minutes not trustworthy?
From
Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:04:34 +0100
Re: virus alert(was Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question)
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:13:19 +0100
Re: virus alert(was Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question)
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:04:45 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Q: Topic Merging loosing identity
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:59:15 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Q: F.6.4 Role player duplicate suppression
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:57:19 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Topic Naming Constraint
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:49:08 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Topic Naming Constraint
From
Jan Algermissen <algermissen@acm.org> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:39:53 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Topic Naming Constraint
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:06:14 +0100
Re: virus alert(was Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question)
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:40:12 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The Topic Naming Constraint
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:39:33 +0100
[xtm-wg] Q: F.6.4 Role player duplicate suppression
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 02:29:03 +0100
[xtm-wg] Q: Topic Merging loosing identity
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 02:01:58 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Agenda for Austin meeting
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 01:58:46 +0100
[xtm-wg] The Topic Naming Constraint
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 01:27:52 +0100
Re: virus alert(was Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question)
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 01:00:05 +0100
Re: virus alert(was Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question)
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:42:04 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@techquila.com> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:10:25 +0100
Re: virus alert(was Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question)
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:00:01 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:26:24 +0100
Re: virus alert(was Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question)
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:36:48 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:31:28 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:23:38 +0100
Re: virus alert(was Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question)
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:06:09 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:11:23 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:10:23 +0100
virus alert(was Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question)
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:53:31 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:16:01 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:40:20 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:34:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:28:49 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:10:10 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:10:10 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:02:39 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:50:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:40:58 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:24:50 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:22:13 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:14:37 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Jan Algermissen <algermissen@acm.org> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:06:08 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:36:03 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:35:32 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Jan Algermissen <algermissen@acm.org> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:12:52 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:05:22 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:57:07 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:45:05 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:41:43 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:14:58 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:54:26 +0100
[xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:39:31 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A little competition near or in our space
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:51:05 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANN: Online tutorial for TM beginners
From
rho@bigpond.net.au on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:42:55 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] A little competition near or in our space
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@y12.doe.gov> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:37:27 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:30:30 +0100
[xtm-wg] A little competition near or in our space
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:24:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] Implementers Guide to Developing Topic Maps
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:26:47 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Questions about Merging.
From
"Jason Diamond" <jason@injektilo.org> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:03:49 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] What can I do with a Topic Map ?
From
Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:57:46 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Questions about Merging.
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:11:28 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Questions about Merging.
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@techquila.com> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:00:11 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Version number in URI.
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:51:34 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Version number in URI.
From
"Jason Diamond" <jason@injektilo.org> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:16:42 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Questions about Merging.
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 03:07:34 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Version number in URI.
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 03:07:31 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Version number in URI.
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:32:25 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Questions about Merging.
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:18:13 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Questions about Merging.
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:07:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Version number in URI.
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:07:47 +0100
[xtm-wg] Software engineer
From
Kian Haghdad <khaghdad27@yahoo.com> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:23:19 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Questions about Merging.
From
"Jason Diamond" <jason@injektilo.org> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:53:07 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:44:42 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] What can I do with a Topic Map ?
From
"Hans Holger Rath" <hhr@step.de> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:05:00 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] What can I do with a Topic Map ?
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:44:52 +0100
[xtm-wg] What can I do with a Topic Map ?
From
Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:16:27 +0100
[xtm-wg] [ANNOUNCE]: Next InfoLoom seminars and workshops
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:53:53 +0100
[xtm-wg] Canonical XTM - a proposal
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:24:57 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
"Hans Holger Rath" <hhr@step.de> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:09:58 +0100
[xtm-wg] MOTION PASSED: XTM 1.0 AG Review Specification
From
"efreese@pop.sprynet.com" <efreese@pop.sprynet.com> on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 06:50:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Mon, 19 Feb 2001 18:30:38 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: [topicmapmail] PSIs of general communication
From
"Paul Prueitt" <bcngroup@erols.com> on Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:35:26 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:51:02 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:02:14 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:51:50 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] My Vote on AG Review Specification
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Mon, 19 Feb 2001 01:33:18 +0100
[xtm-wg] Agenda for Austin meeting
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:37:28 +0100
[xtm-wg] Big topic map in XTM 1.0
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sun, 18 Feb 2001 23:54:41 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:45:26 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:36:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Sat, 17 Feb 2001 23:15:25 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Sat, 17 Feb 2001 17:14:55 +0100
[xtm-wg] Apologies for broken site
From
Jan Algermissen <algermissen@acm.org> on Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:10:48 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:45:36 +0100
[xtm-wg] PSIs of general communication
From
Jan Algermissen <algermissen@acm.org> on Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:50:49 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:19:01 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:15:52 +0100
[xtm-wg] [010210 Spec]XLink or Xpointer
From
Christian Wittern <wittern@iis.sinica.edu.tw> on Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:03:03 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Fri, 16 Feb 2001 04:18:06 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] REMINDER: Voting for XTM 1.0 closes on Saturday
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Fri, 16 Feb 2001 02:07:30 +0100
[xtm-wg] My Vote on AG Review Specification
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:01:25 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] REMINDER: Voting for XTM 1.0 closes on Saturday
From
Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu> on Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:52:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] REMINDER: Voting for XTM 1.0 closes on Saturday
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:34:42 +0100
[xtm-wg] MOTION ADOPTED: Charter revision - maximum duration of non-face-to-face votes
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:09:35 +0100
[xtm-wg] Wording for consideration - split of chair/editor
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:08:42 +0100
[xtm-wg] MOTION ADOPTED: Charter revision - resignation
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:07:32 +0100
[xtm-wg] An XTM test suite
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:19:19 +0100
[xtm-wg] Apology
From
"Manoj Acharya" <manoj@infichaos.com> on Wed, 14 Feb 2001 20:35:44 +0100
[xtm-wg] Announcing "dexribe"technology
From
"Manoj Acharya" <manoj@infichaos.com> on Wed, 14 Feb 2001 20:34:06 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: MOTION: New charter revisions
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:51:16 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: MOTION: New charter revisions
From
luisjm@luisjm.com on Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:46:38 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: MOTION: New charter revisions
From
luisjm@luisjm.com on Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:46:37 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM 1.0 AG Review Specification
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:42:32 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: TM4J 0.4 now available
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@techquila.com> on Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:34:34 +0100
[xtm-wg] Knowledge Magazines/Journals
From
kennedy@xmlxperts.com on Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:28:28 +0100
[xtm-wg] subscribe
From
"arnonymous" <arnonymous@chello.at> on Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:18:23 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM 1.0 AG Review Specification
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:39:43 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM 1.0 AG Review Specification
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:21:27 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM 1.0 AG Review Specification
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:20:51 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM 1.0 AG Review Specification
From
"Jason Diamond" <jason@injektilo.org> on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:51:36 +0100
[xtm-wg] Questions about Merging.
From
"Jason Diamond" <jason@injektilo.org> on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:22:06 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM 1.0 AG Review Specification
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:05:15 +0100
[xtm-wg] Version number in URI.
From
"Jason Diamond" <jason@injektilo.org> on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 06:51:42 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM 1.0 AG Review Specification
From
"Jason Diamond" <jason@injektilo.org> on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 05:53:31 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM 1.0 AG Review Specification
From
"Eric Freese" <efreese@sprynet.com> on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 00:03:00 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: AG Review Specification
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan@globalwisdom.org> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 23:10:32 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM 1.0 AG Review Specification
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 21:51:51 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 21:40:55 +0100
[xtm-wg] Lars Marius' comments
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 21:29:07 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] FW: Semantic Web
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:56:02 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FW: Semantic Web
From
Dan Brickley <daniel.brickley@bristol.ac.uk> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:49:18 +0100
[xtm-wg] FW: Semantic Web
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:37:53 +0100
[xtm-wg] FW: Proposal for HumanML discussion
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:19:13 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 11:07:19 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] SUO: Topic Maps (fwd)
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:17:16 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 08:58:19 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Editors Alert: scopes on association roles.
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 08:55:34 +0100
[xtm-wg] SUO: Topic Maps (fwd)
From
Jim Farrugia <jim@spatial.maine.edu> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 01:12:38 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] rdf & topic maps
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan@globalwisdom.org> on Sat, 10 Feb 2001 00:27:58 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FW: [kmci-Virtual-Chapter] Re: Working ontologies
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 22:55:28 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FW: [kmci-Virtual-Chapter] Re: Working ontologies
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:40:56 +0100
[xtm-wg] FW: [kmci-Virtual-Chapter] Re: Working ontologies
From
"Paul Prueitt" <bcngroup@erols.com> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:15:05 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:59:27 +0100
[xtm-wg] RE: rdf & topic maps
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan-pop@cog-tech.com> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:25:52 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:21:38 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:33:56 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:58:37 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] rdf & topic maps
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:52:17 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:42:43 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Editors Alert: scopes on association roles.
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:55:38 +0100
[xtm-wg] rdf & topic maps
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan@globalwisdom.org> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 05:37:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 04:42:11 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@kalido.com> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 21:41:51 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 21:06:35 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Feedback on Processing Requirements F3.2
From
luisjm@luisjm.com on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 19:36:47 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 19:19:44 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@kalido.com> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 18:59:32 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 18:12:21 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Feedback on Processing Requirements F3.2
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:52:22 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Feedback on Processing Requirements F3.2
From
"Luis J. Martinez" <luisjm@luisjm.com> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:35:17 +0100
[xtm-wg] Bernard's comments
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:40:16 +0100
[xtm-wg] Eric's comments
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:39:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] Nikita's comments
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:38:28 +0100
[xtm-wg] Andrius' comments
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:37:49 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] 1.0 Spec Comments
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:28:16 +0100
[xtm-wg] Wording for Status section
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:59:50 +0100
[xtm-wg] 1.0 Spec comments
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:54:59 +0100
[xtm-wg] Spec comments
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:51:48 +0100
[xtm-wg] Genesis of Terms, and Why do we care?
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 08:34:17 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] 1.0 Spec Comments
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 06:48:16 +0100
[xtm-wg] Thank you! A Few Thoughts on Terminology
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 06:26:34 +0100
[xtm-wg] Feedback on Processing Requirements F3.2
From
"Luis J. Martinez" <luisjm@luisjm.com> on Thu, 8 Feb 2001 04:03:14 +0100
Re: Feedback on Processing Requirements WAS [xtm-wg] Communication back to normal
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 21:58:36 +0100
Re :Fw:[xtm-wg] alternative to "real-world"
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:39:13 +0100
Feedback on Processing Requirements WAS [xtm-wg] Communication back to normal
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:13:41 +0100
Fw: Fw: [xtm-wg] alternative to "real-world"
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 18:52:27 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: New charter revisions
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 18:33:28 +0100
[xtm-wg] 1.0 Spec Comments
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:49:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] RDF Topic Maps models
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:14:37 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM in the 'real world'
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:01:07 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: charter revision for section 3.3.2.1 on electronic voting
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:17:03 +0100
[xtm-wg] alternative to "real-world"
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:07:28 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: New charter revisions
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:58:20 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: New charter revisions
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:14:39 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Specification: Final Draft
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:01:54 +0100
[xtm-wg] motions - YES
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan@globalwisdom.org> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 22:10:33 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of invited member ballots
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:43:45 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Status of invited member ballots
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:31:59 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: New charter revisions
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 20:59:53 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: New charter revisions
From
Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 20:10:32 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: charter revision for section 3.3.2.1 on electronic voting
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 20:08:37 +0100
[xtm-wg] MOTION: charter revision for section 3.3.2.1 on electronic voting
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 20:01:00 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: New charter revisions
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:59:57 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: New charter revisions
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:47:39 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: New charter revisions
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:46:41 +0100
[xtm-wg] Montreal meeting: Possible date change
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:24:53 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision - resignation
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:20:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision - resignation
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:18:56 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM Specification: Final Draft
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:17:59 +0100
[xtm-wg] MOTION: New charter revisions
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:12:11 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision - definition of absolute majority
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:10:23 +0100
[xtm-wg] Communication back to normal
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:07:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision - resignation
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:05:13 +0100
[xtm-wg] New file uploaded to xtm-wg
From
<xtm-wg@yahoogroups.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:56:09 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision - definition of absolute majority
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:43:35 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Friendly amendment to MOTION: Charter revision - maximum duration of non-face-to-face votes
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:41:54 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision - redefinition of quorum
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:37:20 +0100
[xtm-wg] Friendly amendment to MOTION: Charter revision - maximum duration of non-face-to-face votes
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:36:46 +0100
[xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision - redefinition of quorum
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:31:25 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision - definition of absolute majority
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:30:36 +0100
[xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision - maximum duration of non-face-to-face votes
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:22:00 +0100
[xtm-wg] TMQL list
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:21:13 +0100
[xtm-wg] MOTION: Charter revision - definition of absolute majority
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:12:42 +0100
[xtm-wg] Austin meeting - March 1-3
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:53:00 +0100
[xtm-wg] Status of invited member ballots
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:29:49 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM Specification: Final Draft
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:25:44 +0100
[xtm-wg] IBIS in XTM
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 6 Feb 2001 00:59:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Specification: Final Draft
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:16:36 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Holger Rath, David Steinberg, Laurent Olivry as a gu ests, Austin.
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:25:31 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Specification: Final Draft
From
Steve Pepper <sylvia@multinet.no> on Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:18:42 +0100
[xtm-wg] New file uploaded to xtm-wg
From
<xtm-wg@yahoogroups.com> on Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:07:47 +0100
[xtm-wg] astounding silence
From
"univers immedia" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Mon, 5 Feb 2001 00:25:28 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Inappropriate Changes to XTM DTD/DTD modifications
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sun, 4 Feb 2001 22:33:40 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Inappropriate Changes to XTM DTD/DTD modifications
From
"Eric Freese" <efreese@sprynet.com> on Sun, 4 Feb 2001 20:13:22 +0100
[xtm-wg] Inappropriate Changes to XTM DTD
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sun, 4 Feb 2001 07:05:52 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Initial feedback on draft
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sat, 3 Feb 2001 13:59:37 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Initial feedback on draft
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Sat, 3 Feb 2001 09:21:51 +0100
[xtm-wg] Deadlines, and my current vote [was: feedback 1]
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sat, 3 Feb 2001 03:36:14 +0100
[xtm-wg] More feedback on spec
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sat, 3 Feb 2001 00:58:03 +0100
[xtm-wg] Initial feedback on draft (a duplicate)
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:00:02 +0100
[xtm-wg] Initial feedback on draft
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 2 Feb 2001 19:43:49 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Marketing and web presence
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan@globalwisdom.org> on Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:41:16 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of TopicMaps.Org XTM Repository of 2001-02-01
From
"univers immedia" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:25:10 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: Update of TopicMaps.Org XTM Repository of 2001-02-01
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 2 Feb 2001 05:14:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] Paris minutes
From
"Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com> on Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:47:21 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The minutes from Paris
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:32:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] The minutes from Paris
From
Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu> on Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:27:21 +0100
[xtm-wg] The minutes from Paris
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:02:49 +0100
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.2