OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
topicmaps-comment
289 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
Elist Home
Match ALL words
Match ANY word
Re: Multidimensional vs. One-dimensional info WAS Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:33:50 +0200
Re: Multidimensional vs. One-dimensional info WAS Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 21:57:57 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] Summary of PM discussion
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 20:38:46 +0200
Re: Multidimensional vs. One-dimensional info WAS Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:46:12 +0200
Re: Multidimensional vs. One-dimensional info WAS Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:05:16 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] Summary of PM discussion
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:04:04 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] Summary of PM discussion
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:16:58 +0200
Re: A-, T- and S-nodes WAS [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 15:38:11 +0200
Re: Canonical XTM WAS [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 15:25:03 +0200
Re: Multidimensional vs. One-dimensional info WAS Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 15:20:50 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] Summary of PM discussion
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:16:57 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] The XTM data model: the wheel has already been invented
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:35:21 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] Summary of PM discussion
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:06:14 +0200
[xtm-wg] Q: "Why has no one read my paper?!"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:41:30 +0200
[xtm-wg] Summary of PM discussion
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:40:49 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Jack Park <jackpark@thinkalong.com> on Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:28:34 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] The XTM data model: the wheel has already been invented
From
auillans@labri.u-bordeaux.fr on Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:19:44 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Fri, 30 Mar 2001 06:28:41 +0200
Re: Multidimensional vs. One-dimensional info WAS Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:14:53 +0200
Multidimensional vs. One-dimensional info WAS Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:02:33 +0200
API WAS Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:50:11 +0200
Re: API? WAS [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:46:49 +0200
graph "chercheurs" WAS Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:40:20 +0200
Re: UML for PM Was Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:38:38 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:36:03 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:29:13 +0200
Re: Canonical XTM WAS [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:28:04 +0200
Re: PMTM4 [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:23:41 +0200
Re: A-, T- and S-nodes WAS [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:17:04 +0200
UML for PM Was Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:08:32 +0200
Luis's Object Model Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:58:47 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:58:28 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:45:45 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:21:37 +0200
RE: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:09:06 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] The XTM data model: a sample topic map
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:47:54 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] The XTM data model: a sample topic map
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:43:05 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:12:40 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] The XTM data model: the wheel has already been invented
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:51:21 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:50:56 +0200
[xtm-wg] The XTM data model: the wheel has already been invented
From
Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@ontopia.net> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:46:30 +0200
RE: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:27:00 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] Graph again ... (and BTW, PSI again)
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:34:30 +0200
[xtm-wg] Graph again ... (and BTW, PSI again)
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:12:56 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:03:14 +0200
Re: AW: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:54:41 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:51:33 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:49:59 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:37:11 +0200
[xtm-wg] DMOZ -> XTM?
From
"Danny Ayers" <danny@panlanka.net> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:11:30 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
RA Poell <poell@fel.tno.nl> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 07:40:50 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Robin Cover <robin@isogen.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 06:22:52 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:18:18 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 02:26:57 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 02:19:06 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:11:05 +0200
AW: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Martin Lacher" <lacher@db.stanford.edu> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:46:58 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Luis J. Martinez" <luisjm@luisjm.com> on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:13:20 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:49:33 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:45:10 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:41:56 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:21:43 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:52:50 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:43:45 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:39:39 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:37:49 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:35:57 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:33:41 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:27:12 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:20:33 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Luis J. Martinez" <luisjm@luisjm.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:14:38 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:14:34 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:09:18 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:07:47 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:05:31 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:05:01 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:01:23 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:40:40 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] Re: A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:35:15 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:32:04 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:24:21 +0200
[xtm-wg] Re: A challenge on "the graph"
From
sam_hunting@yahoo.com on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:20:37 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:15:16 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:10:38 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:08:14 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:03:38 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:57:04 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:54:54 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:52:32 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:08:40 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:01:13 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:44:15 +0200
RE: [xtm-wg] From the chair of TopicMaps.Org
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:37:59 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:42:32 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:36:08 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:28:17 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:25:27 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:13:48 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:09:53 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 07:34:05 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 07:26:42 +0200
[xtm-wg] Extreme Markup Languages 2001 Conference
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 05:15:24 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 04:06:18 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 02:12:49 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 02:04:48 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 02:03:15 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:47:47 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:06:59 +0200
[xtm-wg] Re: What is the "strawman" proposal?
From
"Martin Lacher" <lacher@in.tum.de> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 20:51:33 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM and XSLT
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:55:25 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] Simplified requirements
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:46:36 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:46:34 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:46:19 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:26:55 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:15:08 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:06:37 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:02:47 +0200
[xtm-wg] Mailing list policy
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:25:24 +0200
RE: [xtm-wg] From the chair of TopicMaps.Org
From
"Eric Freese" <efreese@sprynet.com> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 04:20:25 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] From the chair of TopicMaps.Org
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 03:39:51 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] From the chair of TopicMaps.Org
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Tue, 27 Mar 2001 02:13:46 +0200
[xtm-wg] Re: From the chair of TopicMaps.Org
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 22:59:20 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 21:50:45 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] For a general formalism of the semantic web - for more patient and formal work
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 21:39:34 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - alternative proposal
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 21:33:38 +0200
RE: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:51:32 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM and XSLT
From
"G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@cranesoftwrights.com> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:39:41 +0200
[xtm-wg] XTM and XSLT
From
cuba_now@yahoo.de on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 18:58:06 +0200
RE: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:32:53 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:24:21 +0200
[xtm-wg] PSI for PSI definition
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:46:16 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] For a general formalism of the semantic web - for more patient and formal work
From
auillans@labri.u-bordeaux.fr on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:51:17 +0200
RE: PM and CM (Re: [xtm-wg] Simplified requirements)
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 07:25:28 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 06:25:56 +0200
RE: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 06:24:37 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] What is the "strawman" proposal?
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 06:24:28 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] For a general formalism of the semantic web - for more patient and formal work
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 06:22:21 +0200
[xtm-wg] From the chair of TopicMaps.Org
From
"Eric Freese" <efreese@sprynet.com> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 05:55:31 +0200
[xtm-wg] What is the "strawman" proposal?
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 03:00:07 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: Topic Map about Topic Map activities
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 02:11:44 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: Topic Map about Topic Map activities
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:15:14 +0200
Re: [xtm-wg] For a general formalism of the semantic web - for more patient and formal work
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:15:32 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] For a general formalism of the semantic web - for more patient and formal work
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:10:09 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] For a general formalism of the semantic web - for more patient and formal work
From
auillans@labri.u-bordeaux.fr on Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:34:21 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] For a general formalism of the semantic web - for more patient and formal work
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:13:05 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Fri, 23 Mar 2001 01:51:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Fri, 23 Mar 2001 01:30:25 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Fri, 23 Mar 2001 01:20:49 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] For a general formalism of the semantic web - for more patient and formal work
From
"jean delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:26:17 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Simplified requirements
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:10:31 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - alternative proposal
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:06:53 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:58:33 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:56:31 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:20:26 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:04:21 +0100
Re: PM and CM (Re: [xtm-wg] Simplified requirements)
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:47:58 +0100
RE: PM and CM (Re: [xtm-wg] Simplified requirements)
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:47:16 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:39:08 +0100
PM and CM (Re: [xtm-wg] Simplified requirements)
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:29:35 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Simplified requirements
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:09:45 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:00:49 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Simplified requirements
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:53:54 +0100
[xtm-wg] Simplified requirements
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:45:01 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:44:11 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - alternative proposal
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:41:23 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - alternative proposal
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:23:47 +0100
[xtm-wg] jTME (alpha) available for download
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:27:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:43:15 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - alternative proposal
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:28:17 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - proposal for requirements
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:59:14 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:55:20 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: New appointments for XTM
From
Tony Coates <tony.coates@reuters.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:22:08 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - proposal for requirements
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@techquila.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:35:58 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
"jean delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:48:17 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: Topic Map about Topic Map activities
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:35:19 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: Topic Map about Topic Map activities
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:23:49 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Whitespace Handling
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:19:37 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Whitespace Handling
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:41:23 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Whitespace Handling
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:03:56 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - proposal for requirements
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:58:17 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - alternative proposal
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:57:41 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:54:50 +0100
[xtm-wg] TM-Template and topic types
From
xtmtester@yahoo.com on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:45:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - proposal for requirements
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:21:11 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: www.topicmaps.net: New informative web site on topic maps
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:49:54 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: www.topicmaps.net: New informative web site on topic maps
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:39:22 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: Topic Map about Topic Map activities
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:33:44 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: Topic Map about Topic Map activities
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:17:09 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM Whitespace Handling
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@techquila.com> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:38:32 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - proposal for requirements
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:51:57 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: www.topicmaps.net: New informative web site on topic maps
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:45:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Conceptual Model
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:59:11 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANNOUNCE: www.topicmaps.net: New informative web site on topic maps
From
"Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:10:32 +0100
[xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:49:09 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Conceptual Model
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:00:49 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Whitespace Handling
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:15:26 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: Topic Map about Topic Map activities
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:25:30 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: Topic Map about Topic Map activities
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:16:24 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Whitespace Handling
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:26:18 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] What are the definitions of "informative" and "norma tive"?
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:24:11 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: XTM 1.0 base Perl package (v0.22)
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:05:16 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: Topic Map about Topic Map activities
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:15:59 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Open Source Project
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 19 Mar 2001 03:39:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] What are the definitions of "informative" and "normative"?
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:48:34 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: Topic Map about Topic Map activities
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:22:38 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] ANN: XTM 1.0 base Perl package (v0.22)
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:05:50 +0100
[xtm-wg] What are the definitions of "informative" and "normative"?
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:00:44 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Conceptual Model
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:21:15 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Binding topic maps without merging
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Sun, 18 Mar 2001 18:33:06 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANN: Topic Map about Topic Map activities
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Sun, 18 Mar 2001 09:56:58 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Binding topic maps without merging
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sun, 18 Mar 2001 09:13:57 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] language.xtm
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sun, 18 Mar 2001 09:10:01 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANN: XTM 1.0 base Perl package (v0.22)
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Sun, 18 Mar 2001 00:53:15 +0100
[xtm-wg] Binding topic maps without merging
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Sat, 17 Mar 2001 19:58:05 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Open Source Project
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sat, 17 Mar 2001 16:19:43 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] language.xtm
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sat, 17 Mar 2001 15:41:24 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] language.xtm
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Sat, 17 Mar 2001 15:38:16 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] language.xtm
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:58:52 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] language.xtm
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Fri, 16 Mar 2001 19:31:36 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM Open Source Project
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Fri, 16 Mar 2001 17:56:08 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] language.xtm
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Fri, 16 Mar 2001 11:06:34 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Re: Fwd: Concept maps
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@techquila.com> on Thu, 15 Mar 2001 22:53:52 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Conceptual Model
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@ornl.gov> on Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:27:42 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 14 Mar 2001 19:05:12 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Conceptual Model
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 14 Mar 2001 17:37:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Conceptual Model
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 14 Mar 2001 17:21:09 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Conceptual Model
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:33:22 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Conceptual Model
From
"Hans Holger Rath" <hhr@step.de> on Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:45:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] Conceptual Model
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:31:02 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Wed, 14 Mar 2001 01:08:44 +0100
[xtm-wg] Announcement : Semantopic Map Project taking off
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Tue, 13 Mar 2001 22:19:16 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:14:19 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Daniel Rivers-Moore <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom.com> on Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:39:18 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Laurent.Olivry@wanadoo.fr on Tue, 13 Mar 2001 04:03:58 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FYI: Buglets on www.topicmaps.org
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Tue, 13 Mar 2001 02:16:11 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FYI: Buglets on www.topicmaps.org
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Tue, 13 Mar 2001 02:02:47 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:21:00 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
"Luis J. Martinez" <luisjm@luisjm.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 23:03:30 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Question: Graphing Tool Advice
From
"Jean Delahousse" <jean.delahousse@mondeca.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 22:42:14 +0100
FW: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
"Bryan Thompson" <bryan-pop@cog-tech.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:43:29 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:33:18 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:31:40 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:26:32 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:09:03 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@y12.doe.gov> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:55:00 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Tools to draw graphs in Python
From
Dan Brickley <daniel.brickley@bristol.ac.uk> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:38:33 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM(P) Questions
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:38:19 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:29:23 +0100
[xtm-wg] Tools to draw graphs in Python
From
Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:27:46 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
"Graham Moore" <gdm@empolis.co.uk> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:54:58 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
"Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 05:04:45 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
"Bernard Vatant" <universimmedia@wanadoo.fr> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:23:57 +0100
[xtm-wg] A modest motion for approval and vote
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:21:03 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Question: Graphing Tool Advice
From
Jack Park <jackpark@verticalnet.com> on Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:10:32 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Question: Graphing Tool Advice
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Sat, 10 Mar 2001 16:22:55 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Question: Graphing Tool Advice
From
"Kal Ahmed" <kal@techquila.com> on Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:02:00 +0100
[xtm-wg] Question: Graphing Tool Advice
From
"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com> on Sat, 10 Mar 2001 14:35:11 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: XTM(P) Questions
From
"Martin Lacher" <lacher@db.stanford.edu> on Sat, 10 Mar 2001 10:43:08 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] XTM(P) Questions
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sat, 10 Mar 2001 08:31:40 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM(P) Questions
From
lacher@in.tum.de on Fri, 9 Mar 2001 20:52:43 +0100
[xtm-wg] Naive approach to representing XTM 1.0 as RDF
From
Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> on Thu, 8 Mar 2001 00:02:22 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: Fwd: Concept maps
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Wed, 7 Mar 2001 23:06:56 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] language.xtm
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 7 Mar 2001 23:03:20 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] language.xtm
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 7 Mar 2001 22:38:53 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] language.xtm
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Wed, 7 Mar 2001 21:29:10 +0100
[xtm-wg] language.xtm
From
Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> on Wed, 7 Mar 2001 18:44:38 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Binding Topics and Topic Characteristics to Time
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Mon, 5 Mar 2001 22:41:10 +0100
[xtm-wg] Datatypes in XTM (Was: Binding Topics and Topic Characteristics to Time)
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Mon, 5 Mar 2001 18:25:13 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] farewell to XTM
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:41:47 +0100
Recall: [xtm-wg] farewell to XTM
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:21:05 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] farewell to XTM
From
Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> on Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:20:13 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Binding Topics and Topic Characteristics to Time
From
Jan Algermissen <algermissen@acm.org> on Mon, 5 Mar 2001 12:29:48 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] Fwd: Concept maps
From
"Mason, James David (MXM) " <mxm@y12.doe.gov> on Mon, 5 Mar 2001 06:16:07 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] Fwd: Concept maps
From
"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com> on Mon, 5 Mar 2001 04:57:47 +0100
[xtm-wg] Fwd: Concept maps
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sun, 4 Mar 2001 19:05:32 +0100
[xtm-wg] Re: farewell to XTM
From
Andrius Kulikauskas <ms@ms.lt> on Sun, 4 Mar 2001 03:43:03 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FYI: Buglets on www.topicmaps.org
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sun, 4 Mar 2001 03:42:58 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FYI: Buglets on www.topicmaps.org
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Sun, 4 Mar 2001 01:26:39 +0100
[xtm-wg] farewell to XTM
From
"Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com> on Sun, 4 Mar 2001 01:15:46 +0100
[xtm-wg] Language and Country XTM Topic Maps
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sun, 4 Mar 2001 01:11:06 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] FYI: Buglets on www.topicmaps.org
From
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> on Sun, 4 Mar 2001 00:42:29 +0100
[xtm-wg] FYI: Buglets on www.topicmaps.org
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Sat, 3 Mar 2001 10:23:31 +0100
[xtm-wg] ANN: XTM 1.0 (Feb, 10th, 2001) base Perl package
From
Robert Barta <rho@bigpond.net.au> on Sat, 3 Mar 2001 03:03:21 +0100
[xtm-wg] Conceptual Model To Syntax Mapping
From
"Daniel Rivers-Moore" <daniel.rivers-moore@rivcom> on Fri, 2 Mar 2001 21:54:06 +0100
[xtm-wg] Binding Topics and Topic Characteristics to Time
From
Eliot Kimber <eliot@isogen.com> on Fri, 2 Mar 2001 14:17:28 +0100
RE: [xtm-wg] XTM meeting location
From
"Chris Angus" <chris.angus@btinternet.com> on Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:12:09 +0100
[xtm-wg] XTM meeting location
From
Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> on Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:42:28 +0100
Re: [xtm-wg] New portal for XML users only
From
Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> on Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:47:27 +0100
[xtm-wg] New portal for XML users only
From
xmlstartkabel@yahoo.com on Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:39:38 +0100
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.2