[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-jplsc] Re: [ubl-l10n] Preparing the UBL 2.0 International Data Dictionary
Dear Jon Bosak, I understand what you said. We (UBL JPLSC) would like to start to revise Japanese translation of UBL 2.0. You said followings at your e-mail posted on May 19, 2008 ----- To begin the work of revision, Roberto Cisternino of the ITLSC will prepare updated versions of your current translations. These revised spreadsheets will contain all of the corrections to Dictionary Entry Names (DENs) and English definitions made in the Update Package, and they will also highlight the translated definitions that must be revised by the LSCs. ----- We will expect the correction version (UBL 2.0 which has highlight to be revised) will be made and be submitted to us (UBL JPLSC). I have another question. What is the exact version number of UBL 2.0 Update Package? The file name of all of spreadsheets in UBL 2.0 Update Package is "2.0", for example: UBL-CommonLibrary-2.0. In case of IDD libraries, there is title in the top of spreadsheets. for example: UBL CommonLibrary 2.0. There is no difference in file names and title of spreadsheets between the first UBL 2.0 and UBL 2.0 Update Package. Is this OK? I think this is troublesome, because we cannot distinguish the update version spreadsheets only by the file name or title of spreadsheets. I think the version number of update UBL 2.0 should be changed to distinguish the first UBL 2.0. For example, the update UBL 2.0 would change to UBL 2.01. Best Regards, Yukinori Saito .----------------------------------------- Yukinori Saito ERP Research Corporation e-mail: y.saito@erp.jp Tel: +81-3-3432-1656 Fax: +81-3-5405-1302 ----------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: <jon.bosak@sun.com> To: <y.saito@erp.jp> Cc: <ubl-l10n@lists.oasis-open.org>; <jon.bosak@sun.com>; <ubl-jplsc@lists.oasis-open.org>; <N.Itoh@otsuka-shokai.co.jp>; <naitoh@is.oit.ac.jp>; <kueno@iea.att.ne.jp>; <tetsuya_tashiro@justsystem.co.jp> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:39 AM Subject: Re: [ubl-jplsc] Re: [ubl-l10n] Preparing the UBL 2.0 International Data Dictionary Hello Saito-san, My apologies for the delay -- it has taken me some time to catch up after returning to work. | (2) Some questions | (a) Countermeasures to the comments from JPLSC | | As you know, I have submitted our JPLSC's comments regarding UBL | 2.0 named "Comments to UBL 2.0 by UBL JPLSC" on September 22, | 2007. I think that the countermeasures or dispositions are not | done perfectly yet. I want to revise the JPLSC translation if | possible, after all countermeasures or dispositions will be | finished and the revised UBL 2.n will be finished. Because, we | (JPLSC) want to revise the JPLSC translation at a time. | | Is it possible to revise the JPLSC translation at a time? All comments from JPLSC were reviewed, and as a result, many changes were made to the UBL 2.0 definitions. Those changes were included in the recently released UBL 2.0 Update Package: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/os-UBL-2.0-update-delta.zip I'm sure I speak for the entire TC in thanking JPLSC for their work in reviewing UBL 2.0. The resulting changes have substantially improved the clarity of a number of the definitions. I'm equally sure that further refinements can be made in this area, but with release of the Update Package, we have gone as far as we can with UBL 2.0. Your review of UBL 2.1 will be very welcome when the first spreadsheets are released later this year. Those new spreadsheets will be a focus of the next UBL TC meeting, which will take place in August. So these next couple of months are the time to finish the data dictionary for 2.0. I will have more to say about this in another message. Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]