[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Negative Votes (Re: workprocess - default process comments)
I also agree; justifications of negative votes are very useful and should be strongly encouraged, but we can't require them in any sensible fashion. -- David Singer, STSM and Program Director, Web Technology Member, IBM Academy of Technology IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California +1 408 927 2509 (t/l 457-2509); fax: +1 408 927 4073 (no t/l) From: "Alex Milowski" <amilowski@lexica.net> Date: 11/09/99 11:51:08 AM (11/09/99 07:51:08 PM GMT) Please respond to amilowski@lexica.net To: workprocess@lists.oasis-open.org cc: Subject: RE: Negative Votes (Re: workprocess - default process comments) > But there is no contribution to process made by refuting the objection > (even assuming the group can agree that it has been refuted), unless > you intend to void the negative vote. > > So *allow* justification, don't *require* it. > I completely agree with Terry. Justifications, when sufficiently explained, can be very useful to the process but you just can't require them. I would repeat all that Terry said, but he said it so well! ;-) R. Alexander Milowski (415) 477-3608 XML Architect amilowski@lexica.net Lexica, LLC 222 Kearny St, Suite 410, San Francisco, CA 94108
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC