[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes Nov 21, 2013
---------------------------------------- DRAFT MINUTES OASIS WS-BRSP TC Meeting 21 November 2013, 11:00am to noon PDT ---------------------------------------- Scribe: Jacques Durand 0. Call to Order and roll call Jacques Durand calls the meeting to order and welcomes everyone. * Roll call: Ram Jeyaraman Jacques Durand Alessio Soldano Tom Rutt Micah Hainline Gershon Janssen Excused: Doug Davis This meeting is quorate. Agenda adopted. 1. Administrative: min Oct 31. (to be posted) 2. Test Tools follow-up status (short) 3. Public Review feedback: - assessment: do we have major, "material" comments? - rough classification: (a) need no action at all, (b) purely editorial, worth doing, (clarifications, typos...) (c) apparently substantial (may be "material" , affect conformance) (d) classification pending (unsure which category) Action Items: AI-1: Jacques to do a more precise inventory of test tools AI-2: Ram: will do inventory of Microsoft test tools, and also check current MSFT licensing terms. AI-3: Jacques: to check WS-I licensing with Jamie, does it have any impact, AI-4: Everyone who developed test tools in the past, to check if their company is OK with an OSS style licensing. Minutes: 1. Administrative: min Oct 31. (postponed) 2. Test Tools follow-up status (short) No progress. 3. Public Review feedback: - assessment: do we have major, "material" comments? - rough classification: (a) need no action at all, (b) purely editorial, worth doing, (clarifications, typos...) (c) apparently substantial (may be "material" , affect conformance) (d) classification pending (unsure which category) 1. Administrative: min Oct 31. External question about rationale for Intl std if we do. - minutes Sept 26.: approved. - long-term goal: ISO specs, as for 1st batch of WS profiles? - Tom: depends on the market demand. E.g. a need for a clear rationale for WS-addressing use? OASIS standards can stillbe referenced by JTC1. But ISO status is good for government adoption. Reminder of categories: - Bucket C1: need not be addressed: the TC can ignore it, i.e. no change in the spec (although we’ll explain why in our comment disposition) - Bucket C2: need a non-material spec change (see definition below) that the TC should do, for the sake of spec quality and also because editorial requirements may need this for OS status. - Bucket C3: need a material spec change: the fix may affect implementations and the normative meaning of the specification. - Bucket C4: don’t know exactly where to classify this comment (1,2,3?) “Non-Material Change" is any change to the content of a Work Product (i.e. specification) that does not add or remove any feature of the Work Product and that: (a) constitutes only error corrections, editorial changes, or formatting changes;…”. A Non-material comment does not require another public review, when fixed. Tom: lots of C2 , no C3 comments. Ram: What are "blocker" comments? some could be material changes. Micah: need to better distinguish Normative vs. non-normative content. Tom will handle the reference related comments. Jacques will work on teh conformance-related. Summary of Jacques review: Summary of my own review of BP1.2 : - The reviewer has categorized comments as minor / major / critical / blocker. We need to answer properly the “major / critical / blocker” - A short list of the major comment types: 1. General packaging : should all profiles be a single Work product (single spec)? (TAB-400) 2. Confusion about Test Assertions status: normative/not? (TAB-265) 3. Confusion about Appendix status: normative/not? (TAB-302) 4. Confusion about some examples status: normative/not? (TAB-290) 5. Conformance Claim mechanism itself: normative or not? (TAB-278) 6. References and citations need major clean-up, some need be updated? (TAB-165, TAB-222, TAB-167, TAB-155, TAB-301) 7. HTML validation issues (TAB-120) 8. Normative scope of content: only the Rxxx or more? (TAB-267) 4. Adjourn |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]