[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsdm] Issues for todays agenda
Heather, My apologies for missing the call today, but I am on vacation. Andrea -----Original Message----- From: Heather Kreger [mailto:kreger@us.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 7:29 AM To: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: wjbumpus@yahoo.com Subject: [wsdm] Issues for todays agenda Hi, I just wanted to give an update on todays agenda and some issues we'd like to discuss: 1. F2F logistics 10 min 2. Common Base Event submission from IBM, supported by CA and TalkingBlocks. Submission posted Licensing Move to accept and vote .3. WSMF OGSI Refactoring progress report - 30 min ISSUE for the TC: There have been requirements that we support WS-I and OGSI with our work in WSDM. We need to discuss and decide from one of the following options (pardon my extreme simplification of a complex issue) a. Support WSDL 1.1 only (do not define an OGSI based solution) b. Support GWSDL only (only define an OGSI based solution) c. Support WSDL 1.1 and GWSDL where we only define GWSDL renderings and the WSDL 1.1. renderings are generated from the GWSDL. d. Support WSDL 1.1 and GWSDL where appropriate interfaces are created for each, but WSDL 1.1 is not created from GWSDL. There are a few questions that go with these: a. Is it important to have consistent management operations between WSDL and GWSDL? b. Are we at liberty to 'borrow' interfaces from OGSI and create WSDL 1.1 interfaces for them so that we can leverage some common technologies. Including but not limited to: - Service Data - Service Group 4. MUWS requirements progress report and review - 30 min Mark has sent the latest version to the wsdm mailing list. 5. Bubble sorting - 50 min Here is an updated set of charts. The first two charts are the specifications of technology we agree we need. This does not mean that we have agreed on what technology is available. On the charts it indicates where specificatoins for this technology is CURRENTLY available or being developed. The third chart shows the differences that we still need to sort out. Today we will discuss the meanings behind these 'bubbles' to see if we can find some common threads or ways to express If we have time we may begin the Meta-model discussion - understanding and agreeing on interface group categories I'm trying to post minutes/charts to the web site but it seems to be another wormy day. Heather Kreger STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems" kreger@us.ibm.com 919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572 You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgrou p.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]