[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Agenda for 8/16 conf call
* Roll call * Approval of minutes from London F2F (7/29 [1], 7/30 morning [2], 7/30 afternoon [3]) - clarifications of [2]: in (2) "proposal: create new issues related to items 1), 3) and 4)." Accepted? in (5) "Proposal to add optional components to the SubscribeResponse" Accepted? * Action items review (from F2F notes) 1: (editors) clarify text to state the assumption that clock skew is small relative to subscription lifetime in the subscribe message 2: (Sanjay) add an issue "that we take action after WS-RF work is done to edit our document to delete/replace/amend the text referring to the implied resource pattern" 3: (Sanjay) close issue 2.10 4: (editors) Any wording in the specification that implies that direct notification is required should be corrected. 5: (Sanjay) close issue 2.9 6: (Sanjay) close issue 2.8 with added clarification to 2.11 7: (Sanjay) close issue 1.2 8: (Sanjay) create new issue to revisit the "MUST implement the IRP" before issuing next public draft 9: (Sanjay) create new issue for "distribution patterns, concerning a way of specifying that a given notification should be sent to one and only one of a set of consumers, including how a consumer requests behavior, how to define what are the members of the set, including need to define a discriminator to determine who in the set gets the message." 10: (Sanjay) create new issue for "the ability to query a log of previously published notifications (persistence replay or the ability to replay messages, history log is just one implementation)" 11: (Sanjay) create new issue for "reliability of the message delivery, when consumers are not available, i.e. some sort of policy to say how to handle consumers coming and going" 12: (Sanjay) create new issue for "proposal to include termination time component of the SubscribeResponse" and include accepted resolution * Finalize logistic for next F2F [4] * Discussion of OASIS new IPR policy and impact on the group [5] * WS-Addressing as only embodiment of IPR? (thread starts at [6]) * "Roles vs. PortType" (threads starts at [7]), "What is the subscription?" (thread starts at [8]) and "Layering of specs" [9] References: [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsn/download.php/8487/20040 729-wsn-minutes.doc [2] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsn/download.php/8371/20040 730-wsn-minutes.doc [3] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsn/download.php/8373/20040 730-wsn-minutes%28afternoon%29.doc [4] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsn/ballot.php?id=525&vr=1& [5] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsn/200408/msg00007.html [6] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsn/200408/threads.html#00047 [7] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsn/200408/threads.html#00039 [8] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsn/200408/threads.html#00068 [9] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsn/200408/msg00080.html Talk to you on Monday, William
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]