OASIS Open: Committees

Shall "Supported Extensions Declaration" extension be adopted as an Interface SC approved extension

http://wiki.oasis-open.org/wsrp/Supported_Extensions_Declaration

This is #6 in the extensions process.
Please abstain if "not interested" and reserve "no" votes for disagreement.

[ ]	Yes
[ ]	No
[ ]	Abstain

Opening:		Thursday, 13 November 2008 @ 05:00 pm EST
Closing:		Thursday, 20 November 2008 @ 05:00 pm EST
Group:		WSRP Interfaces SC

Ballot has closed.

Voting Details

Voting Summary

Options with highest number of votes are bold

Option	# Votes	% of Total
Yes	4	57%
No	3	43%
Abstain	0

Eligible members who have voted:	7 of 11	64%
Eligible members who have abstained:	0 of 11	0%
Eligible members who have not voted:	4 of 11	36%

Voting Details

Voter	Company	Vote	Reference Document and/or Comment
Rich Thompson	IBM	--
Richard Jacob	IBM	No	technically I think this is ok. However we should tie that to the rewritable resource URLs proposal. Maybe we need to change that one depending on the outcome there.
Mike Caffyn	NetUnity Software	--
Nader Oteifa	NetUnity Software	No	1) I don't think the extenstion is in the proper document location when the consumer is indicating what extensions it supports. Currently, the location is in PortletContext but the extensions a consu
Polina Alber	Novell	--
Michael Freedman	Oracle Corporation	Yes
Nathan Lipke	Oracle Corporation	Yes
Kevin Frender	Oracle Corporation	Yes
Dina Steeve	Oracle Corporation	Yes
Rajesh T	Sun Microsystems	No	Agree on the Supported Extensions if dealt as a separate issue from rewritable URL. Since its tied together voting as No
Satish Ramaswamy	Vignette Corporation	--