< Home | Return to Ballot listing

Ballot Details    TC Member Ballot View
Should the SEE-RA used UML or BPMN?

This ballot aims to gather consensus on the use of either UML or BPMN for the specification of components in the SEE Reference Architecture as discussed in the phone conference on the 30th of January 2009. To aid in this discussion a comparison of the two possible approaches is described in [1]. Please read this document before casting your vote.

[1] = http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/semantic-ex/download.php/31267/ProcessRepresentationDiscussion.doc

 [ ]  UML
 [ ]  BPMN
Opening:   Tuesday, 17 February 2009 @ 05:00 pm UTC
Closing:   Tuesday, 24 February 2009 @ 05:00 pm UTC
Group:   OASIS Semantic Execution Environment TC
Ballot has closed.

Voting Details

Voting Summary

Options with highest number of votes are bold

Option # Votes % of Total
UML 1 14%
BPMN 6 86%
Eligible members who have voted: 7 of 12 58%
Eligible members who have abstained: 0 of 12 0%
Eligible members who have not voted: 5 of 12 42%

Voting Details

Voter Company VoteReference Document and/or Comment
Marc Haines
Individual
--
 
Srdjan Komazec
Semantic Technology Institut Innsbruck (ST...
--
 
Federico Facca
Semantic Technology Institut Innsbruck (ST...
--
 
Nathalie Steinmetz
Semantic Technology Institut Innsbruck (ST...
--
 
Michal Zaremba
Semantic Technology Institut Innsbruck (ST...
BPMN
 
Mick Kerrigan
Semantic Technology Institut Innsbruck (ST...
BPMN
 
Reto Krummenacher
Semantic Technology Institut Innsbruck (ST...
BPMN
 
Christian Leibold
Semantic Technology Institut Innsbruck (ST...
BPMN
 
Omair Shafiq
Semantic Technology Institut Innsbruck (ST...
UML
 
John Domingue
The Open University
--
 
Barry Norton
The Open University
BPMN
 
Carlos Pedrinaci
The Open University
BPMN