Do you approve Working Draft of the COEL Specifications Version 01 and revisions as indicated and all associated artefacts packaged together in
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/coel/document.php?document_id=56853
as a Committee Specification Draft.
Revision details:
PQI-v1.0-wd01 - R11
IDA-v1.0-wd01 - R13
RPE-v1.0-wd01 - R10
MMI-v1.0-wd01 - R13
BAP-v1.0-wd01 - R09
COEL-v1.0-wd01 - R06
cluster.json - R01
class.json - R01
subclass.json - R01
element.json - R01
NB: Paul has made the following changes sine our earlier aborted ballot:
BAP
- contains the phrase 'pseudonymous identity key'. I think 'identity should be removed'
MMI:
- Section 2 'Coeition' misspelling
- Section 2.1: paragraphs on A&A are not what we agreed: See IDA example:
"HTTP basic authentication SHALL be used to authenticate calls to the API. Passwords SHOULD be 64 bytes in length and supplied as a base 64 encoding string. This MUST be converted to ASCII and prefixed with the userid followed by a colon to form the token passed in the HTTP Authorisation Header."
Section 2.1 ; mis-spellings like '5uthorized5d'
- Section 2.7 Bug referred to yesterday: Timestamp and Signature should refer to DeviceID, not ConsumerID
One additional change I made was to add OperatorID to the inputs of operator/device on the basis that there is no authorisation header in this request (as with operator/consumer).
- Removed Coelition Ecosystem from the document.
PQI:
- Section 2.1: paragraphs on A&A are not what we agreed: See IDA example above
- Misspelling '5nrecognized'
- Section 2: Paragraph "The query interface has one method ..." has no normative keywords.
IDA
- Section 4.2: misspelling: '7uthorized7d |
