< Home | Return to Ballot listing

Ballot Details    TC Member Ballot View
select versioning scheme for the next spec revision

what should the next revision number be?

hat should we call the next version of the virtio spec?

The issue is that unfortunately current
spec versions all have "latest" link to
http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.0/virtio-v1.0.html

Also, Google search for virtio still tends to turn up csprd01
and that has the above link in it.

I asked about adding links to
http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/latest/final/virtio-latest.html
http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/latest/final/virtio-latest.pdf

but did not get a response so apparently no go.

Options:
1. virtio 1.0 cs05.
Pros: latest link will point to the correct version.
Cons: seems to be confusing to people - 1.0 is a product so one
would expect 1.0 be in bugfixes-only mode at this point.
And what would we call a bugfix branch if we ever made one?

2. virtio 1.1
Pros: internet searches will start finding the new version (although
there's a risk it will get struct at csprd01 again).
Cons: latest links from 1.0 will not point at this one.

3. virtio 2.0
Pros: publicity. people will know it's a new spec.
Also, this leaves an option to do a bugfix release and call it 1.1.
Cons: people might get confused thinking it's not backwards compatible.

Amendment Posted on Wednesday, 3 August 2016:
typo: hat should we -> what should we

 [ ]  virtio 1.0 cs05
 [ ]  virtio 1.1
 [ ]  virtio 2.0
 [ ]  Other:
Opening:   Wednesday, 3 August 2016 @ 05:00 pm EDT
Closing:   Wednesday, 10 August 2016 @ 05:00 pm EDT
Group:   OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC
Ballot has closed.

Referenced Items
Name Type Date Action
Document
2016-08-10

Voting Details

Voting Summary

Options with highest number of votes are bold

Option # Votes % of Total
virtio 1.0 cs05 0 0%
virtio 1.1 5 83%
virtio 2.0 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Eligible members who have voted: 6 of 7 86%
Eligible members who have abstained: 0 of 7 0%
Eligible members who have not voted: 1 of 7 14%

Voting Details

Voter Company VoteReference Document and/or Comment
Cornelia Huck
IBM
virtio 1.1
Daniel Kiper
Oracle
virtio 1.1
 
Den Lunev
Parallels IP Holdings GmbH
virtio 1.1
 
Amit Shah
Red Hat
virtio 1.1
 
Stefan Hajnoczi
Red Hat
virtio 1.1
 
Michael S. Tsirkin
Red Hat
virtio 2.0
 
Jan Kiszka
Siemens AG
--