|
Do you approve submitting XLIFF Version 2.1 to the OASIS membership for consideration as a Candidate OASIS Standard?
XLIFF Version 2.1 [1] was approved as a Committee Specification on 23 August 2017. The TC has received 5 Statements of Use from ENLASO Corp, Felix Sasaki, Umbraco, SDL Trados Studio, and Soroush Saadatafar [2]. Do you now approve submitting XLIFF Version 2.1 CS01 to the OASIS membership for consideration as a Candidate OASIS Standard?
Approving this ballot will result in a 60-day public review after which, if no comments are received, the COS will be submitted to a membership-wide ballot. If comments are received, the TC will be asked to vote by Special Majority Ballot on whether to continue to the membership vote. This is explained in TC Process section 3.4.2, Public Review of a Candidate OASIS Standard [3].
This ballot requires a Special Majority Vote [4]. The TC roster currently lists 6 voting members. In order to pass, at least 4 (2/3 x 6) members have to vote Yes and no more than 1 (1/4 x 6) members may vote No.
[1] URI to the Committee Specification: http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html
[2] Links to Statements of Use
ENLASO Corporation: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201709/msg00006.html
Felix Sasaki, Individual: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201709/msg00007.html
Soroush Saadatafar, Individual: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/201710/msg00005.html
SDL Trados Studio: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/201710/msg00004.html
Umbraco: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/201710/msg00003.html
[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#OASISstandard
[4] Special Majority Vote: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process-2010-07-28.php#dSpecialMajority
|
