OASIS Open: Committees

Approve Additional ECC Curves proposal for inclusion in PKCS#11 v3.0

Do you approve Additional ECC Curves proposal for inclusion in PKCS#11 v3.0?

EdDSA Using CFRG concept of Octet Key Pairs

[ ]	Yes
[ ]	No

Ballot has closed.

Referenced Items
Name	Type	Date	Action
EdDSA Using Additional Key Types uploaded (81K)	Document	2017-11-15	Details
03151: Approve Additional ECC Curves proposal for inclusion in PKCS#11 v3.0 (22K)	Document	2017-11-22	Details

Voting Details

Voting Summary

Options with highest number of votes are bold

Option	# Votes	% of Total
Yes	9	100%
No	0	0%

Eligible members who have voted:	9 of 14	64%
Eligible members who have abstained:	0 of 14	0%
Eligible members who have not voted:	5 of 14	36%

Voter	Company	Vote	Reference Document and/or Comment
Tony Cox	Cryptsoft Pty Ltd.	Yes
Justin Corlett	Cryptsoft Pty Ltd.	Yes
Greg Scott	Cryptsoft Pty Ltd.	Yes
Tim Hudson	Cryptsoft Pty Ltd.	Yes	Voting for the attached proposal - ignoring the incorrect ballot description.
Bruce Rich	Cryptsoft Pty Ltd.	Yes	Agree with Dieter & Darren comments of name adjustment.
Gerald Stueve	Fornetix	Yes	Agree with Dieter & Darren comments of name adjustment.
Gershon Janssen	Individual	--
Valerie Fenwick	Intel Corporation	--
Indra Fitzgerald	Micro Focus	--
John Leiseboer	QuintessenceLabs Pty Ltd.	Yes
Robert Relyea	Red Hat	--
Darren Johnson	SafeNet, Inc.	Yes	The ballot description says "CFRG", but the referenced proposal is for the "additional key types" proposal. I'm voting "yes" to the "additional key types" proposal.
Daniel Minder	Utimaco IS GmbH	--
Dieter Bong	Utimaco IS GmbH	Yes	Given that the attachment and the ballot question is about the additional ECC Curves proposal, I vote "yes" for the additional ECC curves proposal, not for the CFRG proposal.