Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following.
If you disagree, please vote No.
If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain.
I move that:
The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue:
Issue #15: Use a consistent wording for device status
--------------------------------------
There is a part called "device status field" in a Virtio device. Currently, both of \field{status} and \field{device status} are used to refer to it, which is a bit confusing. This proposal is to change the spec to use \field{device status} consistently. More details could be found from the below link:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201806/msg00131.html
--------------------------------------
The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification:
--------------------------------------
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201806/msg00131.html
--------------------------------------
The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.1-cs01", and future versions of the
specification.
--------------------------------------
Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As
the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by
electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot
in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the
close of the second ballot missed.
-------------------------------------- |