Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following.
If you disagree, please vote No.
If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain.
I move that:
The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue:
Issue #132: virtio-vsock: add seqpacket support
--------------------------------------
`seqpacket` sockets provide in-order, guaranteed, connection-oriented delivery with message and record boundaries.
To support `seqpacket` in virtio-vsock devices, we add:
- a new socket type (`VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET`)
- a new feature (`VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET`)
- two flags to support message and record boundaries (`VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM`. `VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR`).
Latest series:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202201/msg00050.html
--------------------------------------
The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification:
--------------------------------------
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202201/msg00050.html
--------------------------------------
The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.2-cs01", and future versions of the
specification.
--------------------------------------
Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As
the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by
electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot
in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the
close of the second ballot missed.
-------------------------------------- |
