|
Should the TC accept changes listed in the description to resolve issue 157,
for inclusion in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.3-cs01", and future versions of the specification?
Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following.
If you disagree, please vote No.
If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain.
I move that:
The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue:
Issue #157: Split transport specific files
--------------------------------------
Problem statement:
Currently several tens of pages worth of transport specific content is situated in single file.
Many parts of the specification are already maintained in separate files.
Such separate files enables better maintenance of the specification overall.
Solution:
Follow the approach similar to rest of the spec, and keep transport specific spec in their individual files.
Link to patches: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202302/msg00578.html
--------------------------------------
The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification:
--------------------------------------
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202302/msg00578.html
--------------------------------------
The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.3-cs01", and future versions of the
specification.
--------------------------------------
Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As
the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by
electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot
in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the
close of the second ballot missed.
--------------------------------------
|
