Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following.
If you disagree, please vote No.
If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain.
I move that:
The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue:
Issue #169: improve PCIx msix register description
--------------------------------------
Problem:
Current wording queue_msix_vector and config_msix_vector says "for MSI-X", which is bit confusing.
Solution:
config_msix_vector and queue_msix_vector are the msix vector number for configuration change and queue related interrupts.
Patch for vote: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202304/msg00436.html
Patch link for maintainers automation: https://lore.kernel.org/virtio-comment/20230421145434.83774-1-parav@nvidia.com/
(contains reviewed-by, ack by signatures).
--------------------------------------
The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification:
--------------------------------------
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202304/msg00436.html
--------------------------------------
The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.3-cs01", and future versions of the
specification.
--------------------------------------
Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As
the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by
electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot
in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the
close of the second ballot missed.
-------------------------------------- |
