Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following.
If you disagree, please vote No.
If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain.
I move that:
The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue:
Issue #168: Correct virtual queue to virtqueue for MMIO transport
--------------------------------------
Problem: MMIO device refers to the virtqueue as "virtual queue".
virtio specification all over refers to this as virtqueue object.
Solution: Correct it to refer to it as virtqueue.
Patch for vote: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202305/msg00185.html
Patch for maintainer automation: https://lore.kernel.org/virtio-comment/20230511163020.708427-1-parav@nvidia.com/T/#u
--------------------------------------
The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification:
--------------------------------------
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202305/msg00185.html
--------------------------------------
The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.3-cs01", and future versions of the
specification.
--------------------------------------
Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As
the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by
electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot
in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the
close of the second ballot missed.
-------------------------------------- |