Document:
02156: Representation of Inline Codes

Draft (A preliminary unapproved sketch, outline, or version.)

Details

Submitted By Mr. Yves Savourel on 2012-01-10 4:08 am UTC

Publication Type

None at this time.

Group / Folder

XLIFF Inline Markup SC / System Ballot Results

Modified by

Not modified.

Copy

This document is not a copy.

Technical Contact

None at this time.

Download Count

724

Download Agreement

None at this time.

Description

How should inline codes should be represented? Essentially this is to decide if span-like codes can be represented with span-like elements in XLIFF 2.0. In addition this also decides if sc/ec should be a special case of ph. a) ph, pc, sc, ec: ph for placeholder codes (e.g ) pc for well-formed span-like codes (e.g ...) sc/ec for span-like codes that are not well-formed. b) ph, sc, ec: ph for placeholder codes (e.g ) sc/ec represent all span-like codes (well-formed and not well-formed), no pc c) ph, pc: ph for placeholder codes (e.g ) and for not-well-formed span-like codes (no sc/ec) pc for well-formed span-like codes (e.g ...) d) ph: everything is represented with ph