Description
Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following. If you disagree, please vote No. If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain. I move that: The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue: Issue #15: Use a consistent wording for device status -------------------------------------- There is a part called "device status field" in a Virtio device. Currently, both of field{status} and field{device status} are used to refer to it, which is a bit confusing. This proposal is to change the spec to use field{device status} consistently. More details could be found from the below link: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201806/msg00131.html -------------------------------------- The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification: -------------------------------------- https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201806/msg00131.html -------------------------------------- The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.1-cs01", and future versions of the specification. -------------------------------------- Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the close of the second ballot missed. --------------------------------------