Minutes
Agenda
Minutes
Action Items
Resolution: Minutes of 2009-06-04 telcon located at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200906/msg00008.html approved
<anish>
Martin C thinks anish should do the minutes
<Martin C>
#0086 Sanjay Revise predicate for Test Assertions SP01-1 and SP01-2 to follow a style of statement of fact concerning the
target of the test, etc.
#0087 Sanjay Replace the term process definition with WS-BPEL process wherever it occurs in the test assertions.
#0088 Sanjay Update the prerequisite for test assertions SP03-2, SP02-3, SP05-2 and SP05-3 as discussed on the 6/4 conf-call
<Martin C>
86, 87 and 88 done
anish i usually do those things when i format the minutes (so that the script generates all the right resolutions, actions,
roll etc). Thought I would do it in real time
anish martin you are really faint
<Martin C>
68 and 84: closed
Test assertions
<Martin C>
note cover page says 09 and 10 april. this info must be updated on each release!
<Martin C>
both above rephrased to change predicate to read like a statement of fact
<anish>
minor ed comment: SP03-3 has a different font
<anish>
SP03-2 and SP03-3 both have a different font
Action: Editors to global replace sbpel2019 with sbpel2020, sbel2021 and spbel2022
<Dieter Koenig>
page 13 , SBL-TA-2017
<Dieter Koenig>
... can go away
<Martin C>
Since SBEL2019 no longer exists what do we do with it?
<Dieter Koenig>
the other references to SBPEL2019 are in SBL-TA-SP03-3 and in SBL-TA-SP05-3
Action: Editors to remove SBL-TA-2017anish thinks that we already made a decision to remove 2017, it just hasn't been done yet
<Martin C>
SBL-TA-SP05-2, SBL-TA-SP05-3, similar changes to SP03
<Martin C>
SBL-TA-SP08, rephrased predicate
<Martin C>
schema can validate qnames, we need to validate they are intents, but isnt this the job of sca policy assertions
<anish>
[SBPEL3022] The contents of the sca-bpel:requires attribute MUST be exactly as specified in the SCA Policy Framework Specification
for the contents of the @sca:requires attribute.
<Martin C>
The proposal above refers to the spec text
<Martin C>
Need a new issues to change the spec wrt SBPEL3022
<Martin C>
There is no assertion for SBPEL3021, do we need one?
<Martin C>
Need to raise an issue to adress this, but Dieter notes this would reverse resolution to ISSUE-35
<Martin C>
so to address this 35 would need to be re-openned
<Martin C>
There should be at least one assertion for SBPEL3021
Action: Mike E to draft assertion(s) for SBPEL3021
<anish>
the new issue has been filed
<Martin C>
SBL-TA-SP09, needs to be split to separate out service and references
Action: Sanjay to split SBPL-TA-SP09
<Dieter Koenig>
minor editing: on page 24, the section "Cross Mapping ..." should not reference SBPEL3013, SBPEL3014, SBPEL3017 because these
conformance items no longer exist
<Martin C>
Cross mapping table needs to be updated
<Dieter Koenig>
Next week's call is in parallel with the BPEL4People TC F2F meeting
<Martin C>
need to decide whether to have a call on 2nd July
<Martin C>
Sanjay hopes to have his actions done before his well earned vacation
anish have to step out
<Martin C>
Danny moves to cancel next weeks meeting due to B4p F2F, 2nd Nageeb, passed w/o
Martin C is bitter and twisted
<Martin C>
straglers, nageeb
<Martin C>
meeting closed
