Ballot Details: Moves the SC proposal to the TC (CLOSED)

Ballot Question Agree that the current SC proposal should be send to the TC?
Ballot Description Do you agree that the current SC proposal for the Inline Markup (with the small change in section 2.6.7.1 as described here: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-inline/201212/msg00004.html) should be send to the TC?
Ballot Options
VOTING CLOSED: Tuesday, 18 December 2012 @ 7:00 am EST
Yes 6 100
No 0 0
Abstain 0
Open Date Tuesday, 11 December 2012 @ 7:00 am EST
Close Date Tuesday, 18 December 2012 @ 7:00 am EST

Voting Statistics

Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) 6
Eligible members who have voted 6 of 10 60%
Eligible members who have not voted 4 of 10 40%

Voting Summary by Option

Options with highest number of votes are bold
Option # Votes % of Total
Yes 6 100%
No 0 0%
Abstain 0

Voting Details

Voter Name Company Vote * Time (UTC) Comments
* Estreen, Fredrik Lionbridge Yes 2012-12-11 16:03:00
* Filip, David Localisation Research Centre Yes 2012-12-11 21:52:00 1
* Prause, Ingo SDL Yes 2012-12-17 14:05:00
* Ryoo, Jung Woo Oracle Yes 2012-12-17 14:19:00
* Savourel, Yves ENLASO Corporation Yes 2012-12-11 15:48:00
* Schnabel, Bryan Individual Yes 2012-12-11 18:20:00
* Cover, Robin OASIS --
* Michael, Alan Microsoft --
* Morado Vazquez, Lucia Localisation Research Centre --
* Walters, David IBM --

Voter Comments

Submitter Vote Comment
Filip, David
Localisation Research Centre		 Yes I agree that the TC work is done, there are however a few pending issues (apart from the changes specified on the last SC meeting) to be addressed at the TC level, including
1) extensibility of markers, 2) re-segmentation related issues 3) impact of storage size/length restrictions module. When handing over to TC, it should be made clear what is the outcome and that the above is left for TC level resolution. Cheers dF