Ballot Details: Approve submitting XLIFF Version 2.0 as a Candidate OASIS Standard (CLOSED) |
|||||||||
Ballot Question | Do you approve submitting XLIFF Version 2.0 Committee Specification 01 to the OASIS membership for consideration as a Candidate OASIS Standard? | ||||||||
Ballot Description | XLIFF Version 2.0 [1] was approved as a Committee Specification on 31 March 2014. The TC has received 5 Statements of Use from Bryan Schnabel, ENLASO Corporation, Localisation Research Centre, Moravia and CNGL [2]. Approving this ballot will result in a 60-day public review after which, if no comments are received, the COS will be submitted to a membership-wide ballot. If comments are received, the TC will be asked to vote by Special Majority Ballot on whether to continue to the membership vote. This is explained in TC Process section 3.4.2, Public Review of a Candidate OASIS Standard [3]. This ballot requires a Special Majority Vote [4]. The TC roster currently lists 13 voting members. In order to pass, at least 9 (2/3 x 13) members have to vote Yes and no more than 3 (1/4 x 13) members may vote No. [1] URI to the Committee Specification: http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.0/cs01/xliff-core-v2.0-cs01.html [2] Links to Statements of Use https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/xliff/trunk/StatementsOfUse/Submitted/#_trunk_StatementsOfUse_Submitted_ [3] http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#OASISstandard [4] Special Majority Vote: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process-2010-07-28.php#dSpecialMajority |
||||||||
Ballot Options |
VOTING CLOSED: Sunday, 27 April 2014 @ 11:59 pm UTC
|
||||||||
Open Date | Monday, 21 April 2014 @ 12:00 am UTC | ||||||||
Close Date | Sunday, 27 April 2014 @ 11:59 pm UTC | ||||||||
Ballot Type | Official, as defined by organization policies and procedures |
Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) | 12 | |
Eligible members who have voted | 12 of 13 | 92.308% |
Eligible members who have not voted | 1 of 13 | 7.692% |
Options with highest number of votes are bold | ||
Option | # Votes | % of Total |
---|---|---|
Yes | 12 | 100% |
No | 0 | 0% |
Abstain | 0 |
Voter Name | Company |
Vote
![]() |
Time (UTC) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
IBM | Yes | 2014-04-21 14:08:00 | |
![]() |
Individual | Yes | 2014-04-21 01:52:00 | |
![]() |
Lionbridge | Yes | 2014-04-23 08:49:00 | |
![]() |
Localisation Research Centre | Yes | 2014-04-21 23:31:00 | |
![]() |
Microsoft | Yes | 2014-04-21 17:49:00 | |
![]() |
University of Geneva | Yes | 2014-04-25 10:07:00 | |
![]() |
Localisation Research Centre | Yes | 2014-04-26 16:12:00 | |
![]() |
ENLASO Corporation | Yes | 2014-04-21 00:13:00 | |
![]() |
Individual | Yes | 2014-04-22 19:55:00 | |
![]() |
Microsoft | Yes | 2014-04-21 18:25:00 | |
![]() |
IBM | Yes | 2014-04-21 11:13:00 | |
![]() |
Localisation Research Centre | Yes | 2014-04-22 12:27:00 | |
![]() |
Lionbridge | -- |