Ballot Details: Approve SAML v2.0 Protocol Extension for Requesting Attributes per Request Version 1.0 with Non-Material Changes as a CS? (CLOSED)
|Ballot Question||Do you approve SAML v2.0 Protocol Extension for Requesting Attributes per Request Version 1.0  with Non-Material Changes  as a Committee Specification?|
|Ballot Description||This ballot requires a Special Majority Vote . The TC roster currently lists 4 voting members. In order to pass, at least 3 members have to vote Yes and none may vote No.
 URI for the specification
Internal URI: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security/document.php?document_id=61388
Public URI: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=61388&wg_abbrev=security
 The Working Draft for this Committee Specification contains changes made since its last public review. The changes made are documented in https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security/download.php/61388/saml-protoc-req-attr-req-v1.0.tar.gz (public link: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/61388/saml-protoc-req-attr-req-v1.0.tar.gz). The TC judges these changes to be Non-Material Changes in accordance with the definition in the OASIS TC Process (http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#dNonmaterialChange).
VOTING CLOSED: Wednesday, 23 August 2017 @ 11:59 pm UTC
|Open Date||Thursday, 17 August 2017 @ 12:00 am UTC|
|Close Date||Wednesday, 23 August 2017 @ 11:59 pm UTC|
|Ballot Type||Official, as defined by organization policies and procedures|
|Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions)||4|
|Eligible members who have voted||4 of 4||100%|
|Eligible members who have not voted||0 of 4||0%|
|Options with highest number of votes are bold|
|Option||# Votes||% of Total|
|Voter Name||Company||Vote||Time (UTC)||Comments|
|Cantor, Scott||Internet2||Yes||2017-08-17 14:23:00||1|
|Hardjono, Thomas||M.I.T.||Yes||2017-08-22 12:01:00|
|Lockhart, Hal||Oracle||Yes||2017-08-17 01:41:00|
|Sultan, Madalina||Connectis||Yes||2017-08-17 07:21:00|
|Yes||I'm ok approving this because it doesn't impact the normative meaning, but I did note that the Appendices are out of order and are appearing inside the document between sections 2 and 3.