Ballot Details: Approval of WD07 of the Language Specification as a Committee Specification Draft (CLOSED)

Ballot Question Do you approve the OpenC2 Language Specification v1.0 Working Draft 07 (WD07) and all associated artifacts as Committee Specification Draft 05?
Ballot Description WD07 was presented to the OpenC2 TC for review and approval at the 20 June 2018 TC meeting, and the Language Subcommittee recommends its approval as a CSD. The balance of the Language Specification (to include portions marked TBSL and TBD in this version) will be provided in subsequent Working Drafts.

The OpenC2 Language Specification v1.0 Working Draft 07 and all associated artifacts are packaged together in oc2ls-v1.0-wd07.zip, https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=63386&wg_abbrev=openc2.

The Markdown (MD) version of the specification will be designated as authoritative.

This ballot requires a majority vote of the TC's voting members.
Ballot Options
VOTING CLOSED: Friday, 20 July 2018 @ 11:00 am EDT
Yes 20 100
No 0 0
Abstain 0
Open Date Wednesday, 11 July 2018 @ 11:00 am EDT
Close Date Friday, 20 July 2018 @ 11:00 am EDT
Ballot Type Official, as defined by organization policies and procedures

Voting Statistics

Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) 20
Eligible members who have voted 20 of 35 57.143%
Eligible members who have not voted 15 of 35 42.857%

Voting Summary by Option

Options with highest number of votes are bold
Option # Votes % of Total
Yes 20 100%
No 0 0%
Abstain 0

Voting Details

Voter Name Company Vote * Time (UTC) Comments
* Brule, Joe National Security Agency Yes 2018-07-11 16:08:00
* Darley, Trey New Context Services, Inc. Yes 2018-07-17 13:05:00 1
* Everett, Alex University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Yes 2018-07-12 02:28:00 1
* Farral, Travis Anomali Yes 2018-07-12 21:51:00
* Gurney, John-Mark New Context Services, Inc. Yes 2018-07-17 22:31:00
* Hamilton, David AT&T Yes 2018-07-18 12:19:00
* Hunt, Christian New Context Services, Inc. Yes 2018-07-18 18:20:00
* Lemire, David G2 Yes 2018-07-18 13:05:00
* Martinez, Danny G2 Yes 2018-07-13 04:45:00
* Riedel, Daniel New Context Services, Inc. Yes 2018-07-17 16:44:00
* Romano, Jason National Security Agency Yes 2018-07-18 14:51:00
* Royer, Philip Splunk Inc. Yes 2018-07-18 15:07:00
* Skeen, Duane Northrop Grumman Yes 2018-07-17 14:07:00
* Sparrell, Duncan sFractal Consulting LLC Yes 2018-07-20 03:31:00 1
* Stair, Michael AT&T Yes 2018-07-17 12:11:00
* Storms, Andrew New Context Services, Inc. Yes 2018-07-18 04:39:00
* Stueve, Gerald Fornetix Yes 2018-07-17 17:06:00
* Trost, Bill AT&T Yes 2018-07-13 14:26:00
* Webb, Jason LookingGlass Yes 2018-07-18 15:51:00
* Yu, Sounil Bank of America Yes 2018-07-16 15:46:00
* Barnum, Sean FireEye, Inc. --
* Barry, Michelle AT&T --
* Bishop, Adrian Huntsman Security --
* Darnell, David North American Energy Standards Board --
* Jordan, Bret Symantec Corp. --
* Kakumaru, Takahiro NEC Corporation --
* Landfield, Kent McAfee --
* Liu, Jason Northrop Grumman --
* Mathews, Lisa National Security Agency --
* May, Andrew Viasat --
* Meck, James FireEye, Inc. --
* Ortiz, Efrain Symantec Corp. --
* Patrick, Paul FireEye, Inc. --
* Ricard, Chris Financial Services Information Sharing and... --
* Sullivan, Rodney NCI Agency --

Voter Comments

Submitter Vote Comment
Darley, Trey
New Context Services, Inc.		 Yes Good progress, looking forward to having a high-bandwidth conversation at the F2F.
Everett, Alex
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill		 Yes Great work joe and jason.
For ports use rfc 6335, already mentioned at top of doc.
I see no reason why we cant list IEEE 802-2014 for dealing with MAC addresses and filling out that section (target) since we can do a myriad of things (drop frames esp.) . We could certainly have a profile for a switch that could change a VLAN or drop a MAC.
Sparrell, Duncan
sFractal Consulting LLC		 Yes I do have some issues which I put on github. My issues are all associated with what it takes to make this ready for public comment and CS. I think the current draft is implementable for the use cases submitted to date. I have begun a reference implementation and some of my issues are to ensure interworking. The issues are #93,94,95,96,97,98,99 at https://github.com/oasi­s-tcs/openc2-oc2ls/issue­s