Ballot Details: Approval of SR-4 to Establish Co-Chair Terms of Office (CLOSED)
|Ballot Question||Do you approve of the proposed Standing Rule 4?|
|Ballot Description||SR-4: Election and term of OpenC2 Co-chairs.
1) The Technical Committee (TC) and each subcommittee shall elect two co-chairs for a 24 month term
2) The period of each co-chair shall be offset by 12 months
3) The TC shall hold open elections in the month of March during the during the regular business meeting.
4) All TC members (to include the incumbent co-chairs whose terms are up) are eligible for nomination for an office.
5) In the event of a vacancy (such as a co-chair stepping down prior to the conclusion of their term), a replacement will be elected to complete the term.
NOTE: Approval by a full majority of the TC is needed to establish a new standing rule.
VOTING CLOSED: Monday, 7 January 2019 @ 12:00 pm EST
|Open Date||Friday, 21 December 2018 @ 8:00 am EST|
|Close Date||Monday, 7 January 2019 @ 12:00 pm EST|
|Ballot Type||Official, as defined by organization policies and procedures|
|Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions)||20|
|Eligible members who have voted||20 of 33||60.606%|
|Eligible members who have not voted||13 of 33||39.394%|
|Options with highest number of votes are bold|
|Option||# Votes||% of Total|
|Voter Name||Company||Vote||Time (UTC)||Comments|
|Brule, Joe||National Security Agency||Yes||2018-12-21 14:10:00|
|Considine, Toby||University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill||Yes||2019-01-02 15:48:00|
|Everett, Alex||University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill||Yes||2019-01-02 14:18:00|
|Hamilton, David||AT&T||Yes||2019-01-02 14:51:00|
|Kemp, David||National Security Agency||Yes||2019-01-02 19:15:00||1|
|Lemire, David||G2||Yes||2018-12-21 13:43:00|
|Martinez, Danny||G2||Yes||2018-12-26 18:07:00|
|Mathews, Lisa||National Security Agency||Yes||2019-01-04 16:19:00|
|May, Andrew||Viasat||Yes||2019-01-07 16:58:00|
|Patrick, Paul||FireEye, Inc.||Yes||2019-01-02 17:19:00|
|Riedel, Daniel||New Context Services, Inc.||Yes||2019-01-07 01:53:00|
|Romano, Jason||National Security Agency||Yes||2018-12-21 16:56:00|
|Royer, Philip||Splunk Inc.||Yes||2019-01-02 16:50:00|
|Skeen, Duane||Northrop Grumman||Yes||2018-12-28 14:08:00|
|Sparrell, Duncan||sFractal Consulting LLC||Yes||2018-12-27 14:30:00||1|
|Stair, Michael||AT&T||Yes||2019-01-02 14:28:00|
|Storms, Andrew||New Context Services, Inc.||Yes||2019-01-03 16:44:00|
|Trost, Bill||AT&T||Yes||2019-01-02 14:06:00|
|Webb, Jason||LookingGlass||Yes||2019-01-04 17:28:00|
|Yu, Sounil||Bank of America||Yes||2018-12-28 20:33:00|
|Barnum, Sean||FireEye, Inc.||--|
|Berliner, Brian||Symantec Corp.||--|
|Darnell, David||North American Energy Standards Board||--|
|Gurney, John-Mark||New Context Services, Inc.||--|
|Hunt, Christian||New Context Services, Inc.||--|
|Jordan, Bret||Symantec Corp.||--|
|Kakumaru, Takahiro||NEC Corporation||--|
|Meck, James||FireEye, Inc.||--|
|Ortiz, Efrain||Symantec Corp.||--|
|Ricard, Chris||Financial Services Information Sharing and...||--|
sFractal Consulting LLC
|Yes||I also think the TC should work towards election using Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) both for efficiency (instant runoffs) and fairness (most election experts consider RCV more fair when there are 3 or more candidates). See https://www.fairvote.org/rcv#where_is_ranked_choice_voting_used
National Security Agency
|Yes||Agree that Ranked Choice Voting should be used for positions where more than one candidate has been nominated.
Local government elections do have positions for which there are no nominations other than the encumbent. The vote in that case is "for continuance in office (Y/N)".