Ballot Details: Resolve Issue #74: content: reserve device ID 32 for SCMI device (CLOSED)

Ballot Question Should the TC accept changes listed in the description to resolve issue 74, for inclusion in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.2-cs01", and future versions of the specification?
Ballot Description Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following.
If you disagree, please vote No.
If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain.

I move that:
The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue:
Issue #74: content: reserve device ID 32 for SCMI device
--------------------------------------
virtio-scmi provides a simple transport for the Arm SCMI (*S*ystem *C*ontrol and *M*anagement *I*nterface) protocol ([patch v2](https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202002/msg00069.html)). [This patch](https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202003/msg00012.html) requests device ID 32, as device ID 31 has been requested for virtio-video (#67).
--------------------------------------

The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification:
--------------------------------------
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202002/msg00069.html)).
--------------------------------------

The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.2-cs01", and future versions of the
specification.

--------------------------------------

Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As
the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by
electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot
in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the
close of the second ballot missed.

--------------------------------------
Ballot Options
VOTING CLOSED: Tuesday, 7 April 2020 @ 11:30 am EDT
Yes 1 20
No 4 80
Abstain 3
Open Date Tuesday, 31 March 2020 @ 11:30 am EDT
Close Date Tuesday, 7 April 2020 @ 11:30 am EDT
Ballot Type Official, as defined by organization policies and procedures

Voting Statistics

Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) 5
Eligible members who have voted 8 of 8 100%
Eligible members who have not voted 0 of 8 0%

Voting Summary by Option

Options with highest number of votes are bold
Option # Votes % of Total
Yes 1 20%
No 4 80%
Abstain 3

Voting Details

Voter Name Company Vote * Time (UTC) Comments
* Granata, Enrico Google Inc. Yes 2020-03-31 15:58:00
* Hajnoczi, Stefan Red Hat No 2020-04-01 15:38:00 1
* Huck, Cornelia Red Hat No 2020-03-31 15:46:00 1
* Kiszka, Jan Siemens AG No 2020-04-03 17:25:00
* Moell, Matti OpenSynergy GmbH No 2020-04-03 19:23:00 1
* Carabas, Mihai Oracle Abstain 2020-04-03 15:45:00
* Pasic, Halil IBM Abstain 2020-04-07 10:09:00
* Tsirkin, Michael S. Red Hat Abstain 2020-04-06 15:49:00

Voter Comments

Submitter Vote Comment
Moell, Matti
OpenSynergy GmbH
No I agree with the point Cornelia made, but what happens now? Can the ballot be withdrawn and re-cast?
Huck, Cornelia
Red Hat
No Not opposed to reserving the id, but the ballot is incorrect: The change we should accept is in https://lists.oasis-ope­n.org/archives/virtio-co­mment/202003/msg00012.ht­ml and not in https://lists.oasis-ope­n.org/archives/virtio-co­mment/202002/msg00069.ht­ml (which is the whole spec).
Hajnoczi, Stefan
Red Hat
No Cornelia has a point! :)