Description
Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following. If you disagree, please vote No. If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain. I move that: The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue: Issue #88: Add virtio-i2c device specification -------------------------------------- The specification: ([v1](https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202009/msg00021.html), [v2](https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202010/msg00005.html), [v3](https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202010/msg00011.html), [v4](https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202011/msg00005.html), [v5](https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202011/msg00042.html), [v6](https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202012/msg00050.html), [v7](https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202101/msg00008.html)). The upstream code patch is under review ([v1](https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg47661.html), [v2](https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg48032.html), [v3](https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2020-September/049929.html), [v4](https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg48703.html)) . -------------------------------------- The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification: -------------------------------------- https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202101/msg00008.html -------------------------------------- The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.2-cs01", and future versions of the specification. -------------------------------------- Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the close of the second ballot missed. --------------------------------------