Ballot Details: Resolve Issue #110: Add virtio-gpio base specification (CLOSED)

Ballot Question Should the TC accept changes listed in the description to resolve issue 110, for inclusion in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.2-cs01", and future versions of the specification?
Ballot Description Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following.
If you disagree, please vote No.
If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain.

I move that:
The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue:
Issue #110: Add virtio-gpio base specification
--------------------------------------
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202108/msg00058.html
--------------------------------------

The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification:
--------------------------------------
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202108/msg00058.html
--------------------------------------

The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.2-cs01", and future versions of the
specification.

--------------------------------------

Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As
the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by
electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot
in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the
close of the second ballot missed.

--------------------------------------
Ballot Options
VOTING CLOSED: Tuesday, 17 August 2021 @ 6:15 am EDT
Yes 8 100
No 0 0
Abstain 0
Open Date Tuesday, 10 August 2021 @ 6:15 am EDT
Close Date Tuesday, 17 August 2021 @ 6:15 am EDT
Ballot Type Official, as defined by organization policies and procedures

Voting Statistics

Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) 8
Eligible members who have voted 8 of 8 100%
Eligible members who have not voted 0 of 8 0%

Voting Summary by Option

Options with highest number of votes are bold
Option # Votes % of Total
Yes 8 100%
No 0 0%
Abstain 0

Voting Details

Voter Name Company Vote * Time (UTC) Comments
* Carabas, Mihai Oracle Yes 2021-08-12 11:47:00
* Granata, Enrico Google Inc. Yes 2021-08-10 16:57:00
* Hajnoczi, Stefan Red Hat Yes 2021-08-16 17:02:00 1
* Huck, Cornelia Red Hat Yes 2021-08-10 10:46:00
* Kiszka, Jan Siemens AG Yes 2021-08-17 08:02:00
* Moell, Matti OpenSynergy GmbH Yes 2021-08-10 16:29:00
* Pasic, Halil IBM Yes 2021-08-13 15:03:00
* Tsirkin, Michael S. Red Hat Yes 2021-08-13 19:59:00

Voter Comments

Submitter Vote Comment
Hajnoczi, Stefan
Red Hat		 Yes Overall this looks fine, but I'd like to request a follow-up specifying the character encoding of VIRTIO_GPIO_MSG_GET_LIN­E_NAMES. The spec does not make it clear whether ASCII or UTF-8 or another encoding is used.