Description
Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following. If you disagree, please vote No. If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain. I move that: The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue: Issue #132: virtio-vsock: add seqpacket support -------------------------------------- `seqpacket` sockets provide in-order, guaranteed, connection-oriented delivery with message and record boundaries. To support `seqpacket` in virtio-vsock devices, we add: - a new socket type (`VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET`) - a new feature (`VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET`) - two flags to support message and record boundaries (`VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM`. `VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR`). Latest series: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202201/msg00050.html -------------------------------------- The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification: -------------------------------------- https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202201/msg00050.html -------------------------------------- The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.2-cs01", and future versions of the specification. -------------------------------------- Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the close of the second ballot missed. --------------------------------------