Administrivia:
- Approval of the last meeting minutes from 8/5/2015:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xspa/201508/msg00001.html
- Followed up with the comment resolution process with OASIS on 3/8/2016:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xspa/201603/msg00000.html
- Scheduling the next meeting.
SAML Profile:
- The latest draft was posted at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xspa/document.php?document_id=57755
The following issues are outstanding:
o Verifying the correctness of OIDs for normative value sets for the US realm (needs peer review).
o The question whether to include two separate attributes "supported-obligations" and "supported-refrains" or keep them merged into a single attribute "supported-caveats" considering the conceptual similarity and potential overlap of attribute value sets. The use-case for this attribute needs to be clarified and articulated.
o The question whether the "CD pointer" attribute should remain in the specs, as some members suggested that the stakeholders may no longer need this attribute.
o If CD pointer attribute is to stay, should the CD type be specified as a separate attribute or does the URL, or the metadata of the data object, suffice for specifying the protocol and type/format?
- There seems to be a need for a standard vocabulary for common obligation and advice values.
- There seems to be a need for providing a mapping to encode the attributes as OpenID Claims.
|
XSPA TC call (Conference Call)