XLIFF TC Meeting (Conference Call) | |
Name | XLIFF TC Meeting (Conference Call) |
Time | Tuesday, 02 October 2018, 11:00am to 12:00pm EDT
(Tuesday, 02 October 2018, 03:00pm to 04:00pm UTC) |
Description | https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/members/action_item.php?action_item_id=3663 |
Minutes | Agenda Attendance: Lucia, Tom, David F., Bryan We have quorum. I. Approve July 17, 2018 meeting minutes Df: I second. B: Meeting minutes approved. -ISO Approval Df: We need more people to push the technical work. What we can do now is work on the editorial work on the ISO. This also will help us to create a 2.2 spec. B: I agree with you. Df: I move that I become the liaison to ISO TC 37/SC 5. B: I second. Df: we publish 2.0 through that committee. For the 1st publication we could do it in our own format, for the second submission, we need to do it in their ISO format.
II. Where do we go next? B: We should talk about the next steps. Df:We can look at the features that are belonged by the members of this meeting. B: I think I am the only one that owns a feature. We have placeholders but no content so far in the wiki. B: I still believe in the 2.2. But I have not made a case still for it. David, you own the rendering. Df: TBX is already represented in glossary module. And we have the matches module. TMX is not maintainable because it is in a legal limbo. Andrez Zydron has asked for some progression on this. We really need to take action items and bring people on board. Bryan, could you convince Andrez to come back? We have three technical options:
We need critical representation in the tc. No matter what, it should not affect 2.2. In terms of candidates it should not change in comparison with 2.1. And there is SRX, there will be a segmentation roundtrip. In modern technologies, rule-based is not the only option. We are here to provide a good data model for them to roundtrip information. B: We are talking about three different solutions for the three standards (tbx, tmx and srx). I am proposing that we come up with a new grammar for the lisa standards. Df: I do not think we need a separate grammar. You do not try replace tbx. We are just trying to roundtripping information. I do not think we need a separate grammar for SRX, it is out of our scope. The only case is TMX, because nobody else owns it. Steven is the owner for the segmentation feature owner. B: I will continue thinking on it. Df: Another thing that we could think of is maximising our work: we can move to a monthly meeting and concentrate on the mailing list. B: I agree with it. Df: when we will get the 2.2 momentum, we could resume to the regular work. Df: I move to move to one meeting for month. B: I second.
B: Meeting adjourned. |
Agenda | I. Approve July 17, 2018 meeting minutes II. Where do we go next? B. TM Profile note C. ISO approval III. Subcommittee and sister TC reports IV. New business |
Submitter | Bryan Schnabel |
Group | OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC |
Access | This event is visible to OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC and shared with
|