< Return to Ballot details
Vote Details
| Ballot: Approve EML v7.0 Committee Specification Draft 01 as a Committee Specification |
Company:Individual |
Vote:Yes |
Comment:As I wrote to the list, I think more specificity and clarity on the terms, e.g. in 510 Count, is important for EML. Hopefully we can work out one set of consistent interpretations in P1622 and in future EML revisions we can come up with something that would be a good basis for interoperable implementations. |
|
