Test id | Sumbitter | Test Date | Reviewer(s)/review-date | Comments |
numbering01 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok, but an unnecessary xsl:apply-templates within a template matching a text node |
numbering02 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering03 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok, but an unnecessary xsl:apply-templates within a template matching a text node |
numbering04 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering05 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering06 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering07 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering08 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering09 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering10 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok, but an unnecessary xsl:apply-templates within a template matching a text node |
numbering11 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering12 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering13 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering14 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering15 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok, however I am not quite that familiar with the Greek characters. Test Looks ok |
numbering16 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering17 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok (I think) Test Looks ok |
numbering18 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok. MSXML3 and MSXML4 produce unexpected results, different from those of XalanJ2.3 and Saxon 6.5.2 |
numbering19 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering20 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01 | Test looks ok Test Looks ok |
numbering21 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | The output indicates that all nodes "note" were counted, is that right? Looks correct to me. I also agree with 0 vs empty string when no matching node (Tom A). |
numbering22 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Minor nit: Could omit the 'from'; otherwise, output is correct, scope is good, and description is accurate and clear - Tom A |
numbering23 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering24 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Scope a little wide; tests both sort and number; good test otherwise - Tom A |
numbering25 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Scope a little wide; interacts with mode; otherwise, good test - Tom A |
numbering26 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Accept, but description could be better - Tom A |
numbering27 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering28 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering29 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering30 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test, though very similar to 32 - Tom A |
numbering31 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test, though very similar to 33 - Tom A |
numbering32 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering33 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering34 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering35 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test, though description could be more specific - Tom A |
numbering36 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering37 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test. Saxon 6.2 is incorrect - Tom A |
numbering38 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test, though description could be a little more specific - Tom A |
numbering39 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test, but almost redundant with 37 - Tom A |
numbering40 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok |
numbering41 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering42 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering43 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering44 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test, but very similar to 41 - Tom A |
numbering45 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering46 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering47 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering48 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering49 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering50 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Tom Amiro / 2002-08-29 | Test looks ok Good test - Tom A |
numbering51 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering52 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering53 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering54 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering55 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering56 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering57 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering58 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Shoudn't (1 mod 2) != 1)?, I dont see why the first "note" has a number 1.(see output) OK |
numbering59 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering60 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering61 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering62 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering63 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering64 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Shoudn't elements "aaa", "bbb","ccc", "mmm", "nnn", and "ooo" have no number since they do not have a "chapter" parent? OK |
numbering65 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering66 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering67 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering68 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering69 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Shoudn't the "e" elements have a number (other than 0) associated with it? OK |
numbering70 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering71 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering72 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering73 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering74 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering75 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering76 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering77 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering78 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering79 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering80 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering81 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering82 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering83 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering84 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks ok OK |
numbering85 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks OK |
numbering86 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks OK |
numbering87 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks OK |
numbering88 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks OK |
numbering89 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks OK |
numbering90 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks OK |
numbering91 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18 Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31 | Test looks OK |
Test id | Sumbitter | Test Date | Reviewer(s)/review-date | Comments |
10052 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test looks ok. The xmlfile "91021.xml" is already associated with "91021.xsl" (using the "href" attribute), it may cause confusion for users. |
10053 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test looks ok. The xmlfile "91021.xml" is already associated with "91021.xsl" (using the "href" attribute), it may cause confusion for users. |
84679 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test looks ok. |
84680 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05 Not Available / N/A | Test Looks ok |
84680-text | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test looks ok. Output file is empty. File "84680.xml" is already associated with "84680.xsl" (with the href attribute and may cause confusion). Should use instead "84680-text.xsl". |
84681 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05 Not Available / N/A | Test Looks ok |
84681-text | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test looks ok. Output file is empty. File "84681.xml" is already associated with "84681.xsl" (with the href attribute and may cause confusion). Should use instead "84681-text.xsl". |
84683 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05 Not Available / N/A | Test looks ok |
84684 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05 Not Available / N/A | Test looks ok |
84687 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05 Not Available / N/A | Test looks ok |
84692 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05 Not Available / N/A | Test can be more atomic. |
84694 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05 Not Available / N/A | Whats the main purpose of the test?, format or level? or both? |
84698 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-065 Not Available / N/A | Test looks ok. Can use a reference to the "position()" function on description. |
84699_1 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06 | Only tests format = "a". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_10 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06 | Only tests format = "A". Documentation can be mesleading. Test looks the same as "84699_2" |
84699_11 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-05 | Only tests format = "A.1". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_12 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-05 | Only tests format = "A=". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_13 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-05 | Only tests format = "*". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_14 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-05 | Only tests format = "A 1 A 1 A 1". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_15 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-05 | Only tests for unknown formats. Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_2 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06 | Only tests format = "A". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_3 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06 | Only tests format = "1". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_4 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06 | Only tests format = "i". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_5 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06 | Only tests format = "i.I.a.A". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_6 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06 | Only tests format = "@a". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_7 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06 | Only tests format = "*1A". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_8 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06 | Only tests format = "1>". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84699_9 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06 | Only tests format = "". Documentation can be mesleading. |
84700 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test is probably ok, not familiar with Arabin to properly comment. |
84701 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05 | Test will never get to the "count" statement. No "n" element. |
84702 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06 | Expected output do not reflect data. Not sure about test purpose (argument is not empty) |
84706 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Are we expecting some kind of an error here? |
84714 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test is probably ok, not familiar with Hindu Vowels to properly comment. |
84715 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test is probably ok, not familiar with Thai language to properly comment. My screen only displays "?" for XML data. My implementation quits when executing this test. |
84716 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test is probably ok, not familiar with Russian language to properly comment. My screen only display "?" for XML data. |
84717 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test is probably ok, not familiar with Japanese language to properly comment. |
84719 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test is probably ok, not familiar with Korean language to properly comment. |
84720 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test looks ok. |
84722 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test looks ok, can be further more atomic (however not a critical change). |
84723 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test is probably ok, not familiar with Taiwanese language to properly comment. My screen only displays "?" for XML data. |
84725 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test is probably ok, not familiar with Chinese to properly comment. |
84726 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test is probably ok, not familiar with Far East Ideographic to properly comment. |
91022 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | What's the relevance of the data in the "91022.xml" file? |
91023 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | What's the relevance of the data in the "91023.xml" file? Unable to run test using other processors. |
91027 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Test Looks ok |
91028 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Got different results using another processor. |
91029 | Microsoft | 2001-07-01 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15 | Got different results using another processor. |
numberingerr01 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19 | Did not get the expected error |
numberingerr02 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19 | Did not get the expected error |
numberingerr03 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19 | Did not get the expected error |
numberingerr04 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19 | Test looks and worked ok |
numberingerr05 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19 | Test looks and works ok |
numberingerr06 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19 | Did not get the expected error |
numberingerr07 | Lotus/IBM | 2001-12-24 | Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19 | Test looks and works ok |