RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Presentation outline for next face to face

["Smith, Christopher" <Christopher.Smith@jud.ca.gov>]

I am more than happy to present on 2GEFS at the meeting.  I would still be willing to create a table as I suggested in my original reply if the group feels it would be helpful.  I view this table not as a tool to state "this can do this better than that" but rather as a way to consolidate all of the knowledge we have gained in our experiences into a document to assist the committee in grasping the innovations, developments, and issues related to implementing efiling specifications/products that could assist in the development of Blue.  

Christopher

-----Original Message-----
From: Dallas Powell [mailto:dpowell@tybera.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 1:27 PM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Presentation outline for next face
to face


Christopher,

I understand your concern. My frustration has been that having one person
review may have limited value and can lead to the rest of the committee not
actively participating.  Some need help because they don't understand the
technical ramifications and presentations may help this.

Perhaps establishing a date to submit responses before the meeting, (say one
week prior to the f2f) and asking everyone to at least read the submissions
before the meeting so that the questions that are asked during the meeting
are more educated would be a compromise.

Also, I added an issue on payments into the document.

Dallas




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Smith, Christopher" <Christopher.Smith@jud.ca.gov>
To: "Dallas Powell" <dpowell@tybera.com>;
<legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Presentation outline for next face to
face


Dallas and Committee,

This is a very comprehensive list and provides an excellent outline of the
topics the committee should deal with in developing Blue.  I am still happy
to present how 2GEFS handles these issues but wonder if the committee feels
this is the most constructive way of getting to our goal.  I ask the chair
and the committee, does it wish to devote the time required in the
face-to-face meeting for each of us with proposals (OXCI, 2GEFS, others) to
present on all these topics?

If the committee feels the list of 10 items with subitems that Dallas'
drafted is a comprehensive list, which it appears to be, we could submit
responses on the CourtFiling mailing list.  Someone (and I am happy to
volunteer) could then take the responses and synthesize them into a table
that would provide an easy-to-read way of understanding how the projects
handle the different issues and where there are commonalities and where
there are differences.  With this document in hand, my hope would be that we
could use the time at the meeting to start hashing out some of the issues.

Just a suggestion...

Christopher



-----Original Message-----
From: Dallas Powell [mailto:dpowell@tybera.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 12:15 AM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Presentation outline for next face to
face


In the last phone meeting I agreed to put out an outline of what might be
addressed in a presenation for the next face to face.  I hope that as many
people that have product will accept the challenge.  Our goal for the next
face to face is to define how we are going to move forward with Blue and
when.

Here is my first attempt at some of the items that I think should be
addressed in a presentation.  I am certainly open to suggestions on this
outline.

Dallas

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-courtfiling/members/leave_workgroup.php.