[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Groups - ECF 4.1 and 5.01 document cardinality.docx uploaded
I have corrected both of these issues in WD13 which I just posted.
From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Graham, Gary <GGraham@courts.az.gov>
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2023 12:32 PM To: Jim Cabral <Jim.Cabral@infotrack.com>; legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Groups - ECF 4.1 and 5.01 document cardinality.docx uploaded Jim,
I have now noticed an additional issue with these cardinality changes.
In the newly revised Section 5, ‘MDE Operations’, cardinality is expressed within parenthesis in the Parameters column. These will need to be corrected.
For example,
The highlighted cardinality needs to be revised to be : ‘(1, unbounded).
The above example is not the only correction that will need to be made, ReviewFiling and NotifyDocketingComplete will also require revision:
One additional thought,
Since ReviewFiling will now allow multiple CoreFilingMessages, but still only allows a single PaymentMessage, then shouldn’t GetFeesCalculation (e.g., FeesCalculationQueryMessage) also allow multiple CoreFilingMessages?
Gary
From: Jim Cabral <Jim.Cabral@infotrack.com>
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Thanks for checking my work Gary.
During the meeting Monday, I believe there was a consensus to align document cardinality in ECF 4.1 with ECF 5.0/5.01. I doubt anyone will suggest restricting the cardinality in 5.01 to match 4.1. So, my plan is to update 4.1 with these changes and publish updated Working Drafts of both 4.1 and 5.01 now. Hopefully, that will give everyone plenty of time to review and comment on these before our next meeting July 17.
From: Graham, Gary <GGraham@courts.az.gov>
Jim,
Good analysis and I concur.
For others, the Recommendation summary in the ‘ECF 4.1 and 5.01 document cardinality.docx’ document Jim provided is easier to follow. I color highlighted the section titles below to make them stand out more. Originally I was misreading these as just a sentence continuation on the next line.
Gary Graham
From:
legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of James Cabral
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]