[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] The wiki is live
agree that we should spend some time thinking about a structure before we start For this piece, I see a link structure something like - Wiki home (with link to Post 2.0 docs) - "Post 2.0 docs" (links to individual doc pages sorted into sections reflecting status) - Individual doc page (text from abstract as description, links to PDF etc) make sense? paul Tom Scavo wrote: > I like the idea of section titles for each document stage. This would > allow for a brief explanation of each stage of the process (or an > external link, if applicable). However, rather than link to > *documents* in each section, link to *pages*, one for each document > stream. (I'm assuming of course that this wiki setup allows for > multiple pages.) > > Popping up a level, this "Documents" page would be a second-level > page, linked to from the top-level wiki page, which would have links > to other second-level pages of interest. Not sure what the overall > information structure needs to look like, though. > > Tom > > On 4/17/07, SCOTT CANTOR <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote: >> > I personally liked a table (and was planning on changing the axes) >> > because it made clear what set of docs were at any one stage ... >> > the cost is greater complexity for editing. >> >> Changing the axis would be fine by me. >> >> > How about section titles for each stage, docs get moved up (down?) >> > as they progress? >> >> That would be fine also. >> >> -- Scott >> >> >> > > -- Paul Madsen e:paulmadsen @ ntt-at.com NTT p:613-482-0432 m:613-302-1428 aim:PaulMdsn5 web:connectid.blogspot.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]