[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] The wiki is live
Makes sense to me, Paul! Tom On 4/17/07, Paul Madsen <paulmadsen@rogers.com> wrote: > agree that we should spend some time thinking about a structure before > we start > > For this piece, I see a link structure something like > > - Wiki home (with link to Post 2.0 docs) > - "Post 2.0 docs" (links to individual doc pages sorted into > sections reflecting status) > - Individual doc page (text from abstract as description, links > to PDF etc) > > make sense? > > paul > Tom Scavo wrote: > > I like the idea of section titles for each document stage. This would > > allow for a brief explanation of each stage of the process (or an > > external link, if applicable). However, rather than link to > > *documents* in each section, link to *pages*, one for each document > > stream. (I'm assuming of course that this wiki setup allows for > > multiple pages.) > > > > Popping up a level, this "Documents" page would be a second-level > > page, linked to from the top-level wiki page, which would have links > > to other second-level pages of interest. Not sure what the overall > > information structure needs to look like, though. > > > > Tom > > > > On 4/17/07, SCOTT CANTOR <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote: > >> > I personally liked a table (and was planning on changing the axes) > >> > because it made clear what set of docs were at any one stage ... > >> > the cost is greater complexity for editing. > >> > >> Changing the axis would be fine by me. > >> > >> > How about section titles for each stage, docs get moved up (down?) > >> > as they progress? > >> > >> That would be fine also. > >> > >> -- Scott > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Paul Madsen e:paulmadsen @ ntt-at.com > NTT p:613-482-0432 > m:613-302-1428 > aim:PaulMdsn5 > web:connectid.blogspot.com > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]