[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj] Re: TC Website reorganization, and drafts update
Mary Thanks for your input. Your comments are added to the draft along with Lars Marius' I will answer to all those comments at once later on. Bernard ----- Message d'origine ----- De : "Mary Nishikawa" <nisikawa@fuchinobe.skk.slb.com> À : "Bernard Vatant" <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>; "Lars Marius Garshol" <larsga@garshol.priv.no> Cc : "tm-pubsubj" <tm-pubsubj@lists.oasis-open.org>; "Steve Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com>; "Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com> Envoyé : mardi 15 janvier 2002 05:14 Objet : Re: [tm-pubsubj] Re: TC Website reorganization, and drafts update > Bernard, > > Thanks for putting this together. I have a few comments about the > Recommendations: > > For the new definition proposal for published subject we now have, "A > published subject is any subject for which at least one subject definition > document has been made available by an identified publisher." > > How about this instead if we need to be more explicit: > > "A published subject is any subject for which at least one subject > definition document at a stable URI has been made available for public use > by the publisher identified within the published subject documentation." > > > This is only for clarification, but for the subject indicator definition, > the sentence that Lars Marius recommended is in addition to the first > sentence and does not replace it completely? > > "A subject indicator is a resource that is intended by the topic map > author to provide a positive, unambiguous indication of the identity of the > subject. A resource can become a subject indicator by being referred to as > such by some topic in some topic map." > > For 3.2, in addition to the abbreviated list that Lars Marius proposed, can > we also recommend to add dc:date with a comment that this is the date of > publication? Is version information really needed or would this date suffice? > > Can we also add the acronyms in parenthesis to the published subject > documentation (PSD) and the subject definition document (SDD) definitions? > There are no acronyms used for the other definitions in ISO 13250, so this > may not be good to have acronyms for some but not for others. I just wanted > to put this on the table to be thought about. > > It would be nice to have at least one example of the PSD and the > individual SDDs. > > Best regards, > Mary > > > > > > > > At 07:49 PM 1/12/02 +0100, Bernard Vatant wrote: > >Lars Marius > > > >I've added your remarks along the draft where they belong > >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tm-pubsubj/docs/recommendations/psdoc.htm > > > >I've added section 3 title which had been cut by mistake ... oops > >"Recommendations for Published Subject Documentation" > > > >No special comment on my behalf for the moment, most of your remarks I > >basically > >agree upon at first sight. > >Will think about it over the week-end ... "Devil is in the details" (Sam > >Hunting) > > > >Other comments welcome and will be added the same way. > > > >I keep version 0.1 without added remarks at > >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tm-pubsubj/docs/recommendations/psdoc_01.ht > >m > > > >Cheers > > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- > >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC