[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Index review #2
On 04/21/2004 05:00 PM, Stephen Green wrote: > Not much more to report from my QA pass of the latest index (and brief look > at > associated SC documents). > > The links look OK. Fabio's link analysis didn't seem to have looked at jpg's > and > gif's but these links looked OK too. > > > A few other comments (but I don't think any of the following warrant any > delay > at this stage, e.g. for SC document editing) > [...] > > 5. Customization Paper > There are examples where the prefix for the CCP Schema Module namespace is > ubl: when it should be ccts: > It may be that the use of pseudo-prefixes (for want of a better term - > sorry) such as > ubl: in the NDR document has led to this possible confusion. Well, I wouldn't call them pseudo-prefixes, as they are simply prefixes in accordance with the Namespaces specification ;) but yes, the use of ubl: was motivated by its use in other documents. If the right (for lack of a better term...unless you want to call it "agreed upon by convention") prefix is ccts:, then ubl: should be changed to that. > > [...] > > All the best > > Steve > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php. > -- Eduardo Gutentag | e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM Web Technologies and Standards | Phone: +1 510 550 4616 x31442 Sun Microsystems Inc. | W3C AC Rep / OASIS BoD
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]