[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Second UBL 1.0 Q/A build, take 2 (20 April)
Unused anchors never hurt anybody, I don't see why they should be either pointed at or removed. In fact they provide anchors for third parties to link into the document. What's wrong with that? On 04/21/2004 05:27 PM, Jon.Bosak@Sun.COM wrote: > [Fabio.Arciniegas@postgraphy.com:] > > | Attached you will find a physical report of broken links (none) > | and other factors in the UBL distibution as it currently > | stands. Please note that although there are no broken hyperlinks > | there is a number of broken local anchors. > > The unused anchors are in the CM and FS pieces. I trust that the > authors will take these out in the next revisions; no need to > bother with them now. > > Jon > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php. > -- Eduardo Gutentag | e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM Web Technologies and Standards | Phone: +1 510 550 4616 x31442 Sun Microsystems Inc. | W3C AC Rep / OASIS BoD
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]