[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-50) Can we use the DigitalCapability document as TPA ?
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63966#comment-63966 ] Roberto Cisternino commented on UBL-50: --------------------------------------- Oh today I was not working cause here is an holiday, anyway I intended the sender as an initiator of the agreement. I think there is always an initiator either private or a body like OpenPEPPOL. An agreement could be between parties (something like P2P), or between a party and its service provider (Access Point) and between service providers. ParticipantParty is ok but how can I know who is the sender if I am using UBL without an envelope or even I don't use a business network and just P2P ? Does it makes sense to keep the initiator as sender ? InitiatorParty (1..0) ParticipantParty (1..n) GoverningParty (0..1) is ok (better than HubParty) > Can we use the DigitalCapability document as TPA ? > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: UBL-50 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-50 > Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documents and business objects > Reporter: Roberto Cisternino > Assignee: Roberto Cisternino > Priority: Minor > Labels: DigitalCapability, TPA > > I found the DigitalCapability document is quite close to a TPA (Trading Partner Agreeement) or more precisely to an e-TPA. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]