[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-50) Can we use the DigitalCapability document as TPA ?
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63972#comment-63972 ] Ken Holman commented on UBL-50: ------------------------------- In order to incorporate an initiator, would this be more appropriate? GoverningParty 0..1 ParticipantParty 1..n Then define ParticipantParty as: InitiatorIndicator 0..1 Party 1 That way not only will this allow for a number of initiators (say three parties collaborate to start a group of ten), but if we come up with other participation properties they would be added to the ParticipantParty ABIE. > Can we use the DigitalCapability document as TPA ? > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: UBL-50 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-50 > Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documents and business objects > Reporter: Roberto Cisternino > Assignee: Roberto Cisternino > Priority: Minor > Labels: DigitalCapability, TPA > > I found the DigitalCapability document is quite close to a TPA (Trading Partner Agreeement) or more precisely to an e-TPA. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]