RE: [uddi-spec] RE: OASIS UDDI TC Submission of UDDI V2 as an OASISStandard

[Luc Clement <lclement@microsoft.com>]

Matthew,

It would appear that we are the first TC requesting to move a Committee
Spec to standardization following the Boards new policies on the OASIS
standards process
(http://oasis-open.org/committees/process.shtml#standards_process). It
appears that we need to be more thorough in our submission.

In the interest of not having another failed attempt, Tom and I are
going to have to regroup in January to prepare the submission and make
the announcements necessary. Unfortunately, Tom is out on vacation and
I've run out of time do so, thus the need to delay this submission -
regrettably. We'll discuss this in more detail at the 9 Jan telecon.

Given this delay, I do want to take the opportunity to proceed to accept
the updates to the v2 tModels offered  at
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uddi-spec/200212/msg00037.html. I
would like the TC to accept these updates on the 9th and start the
30-day clock from that point.

Luc

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Dovey [mailto:matthew.dovey@las.ox.ac.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 06:46
To: Daniel Feygin; Luc Clement; Tom Bellwood
Cc: uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org


> The only reason for exception to the process OASIS might be in a 
> position to find acceptable is that public availability of UDDI V2 
> documents was PR-ed all over news media and trade publications.  
> Public comment was provided through means available at the time 
> (public mailing lists).  This was done outside the framework of the 
> OASIS process, but nonetheless it can be argued that the TC fulfilled 
> the principles and the intent of the OASIS process by acting "in the 
> spirit" of the process prior to UDDI's transition to OASIS.

I suspect that the recent updates to the v2 tModel documentation might
invalidate the "Review must take place for a minimum of 30 days, during
which time no changes may be made to the document." part of the process
(but then we need to definte what the document is - I assume all
documents listed at
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/tcspecs.shtml#uddiv2
under UDDI v2 Specfications).

On the assumption that these are the documents and there are no pending
action points for revision, shall we propose a motion (either for vote
via e-mail or at the next TC teleconference), that we open the
specifications for public review as preparation for submitting them for
consideration as an OASIS standard, and announce this in the appropriate
places?

I'm happy to propose this if Tom and Luc are happy that we are ready to
proceed on this.

Matthew