Comments on WS-R by Chris Ferris in his presentation accepted by the TC as public comment

["Bob Freund" <Bob.Freund@hitachisoftware.com>]

Pubic review comments from Chris Ferris:

 

Cf1:  Two schemas and namespaces are unnecessary for two soap versions.

 

 

Cf2:  Why are soap faults not used for RM-Fault?

 

 

Cf3: Not Acking until delivery to the application causes unnecessary delays?

           

 

Cf4: Unclear if the spec can compose with WS-Addressing or WS-MD?

 

 

Cf5: Persistence model will not work on devices with non volatile storage?

 

 

Cf6:  Mandatory Expiry time requires synchronization of clocks:

 

 

Cf7:  There is unnecessary complexity in the spec, headers have unnecessary elements

making them larger than necessary?

 

 

Cf8: The spec does not state that every delivered message MUST be acknowledged.