1 |
Roll Call of Voting Member TC's |
|
|
OASIS ebXML CPP/A TC |
|
(PW) |
Pete Wenzel, SeeBeyond |
Absent |
|
OASIS XACML TC |
|
(HL) |
Hal Lockhart, Entegrity |
Present |
(CA) |
Carlisle Adams, Entrust |
Present |
|
OASIS RL TC |
|
(HR) |
Hari Reddy, ContentGuard |
Present |
|
OASIS XCBF |
|
(MM) |
Monca Martin, Certivo |
Present |
|
OASIS PS TC |
|
(DR) |
Darran Rolls, Waveset |
Absent |
|
OASIS DSS TC |
|
(CA) |
Robert Zuccherato, Entrust |
Present |
|
OASIS WSSL TC |
|
(PH) |
Phil Hallam-Baker, Verisign |
Absent |
|
OASIS PKI TC |
|
(TL) |
Terry Leahy, Wells Fargo |
Absent |
|
OASIS LegalXML |
|
(LP) |
John Messing |
Absent |
(JC) |
Jim Cabral, MTG Management Consultants |
Absent |
|
Integrated Justice TC |
|
(JC) |
Jim Cabral, MTG Management Consultants |
Absent |
|
OASIS WSS TC |
|
(CK) |
Chris Kaler, Microsoft |
Absent |
(KL) |
Kelvin Lawrence, IBM |
Present |
|
OASIS SS TC |
|
(RP) |
Robert Philpott, RSA |
Present |
(PM) |
Prateek Mishra, Netegrity |
Absent |
|
ebXML Reg/Rep TC |
|
(MM) |
Monca Martin, Certivo |
Present |
|
|
|
|
Other Attendees |
|
(PG) |
Phil Griffin, Griffin Consulting
Chair
|
Present |
(KS) |
Krishna Sankar, CISCO
OASIS TAB Liasion
|
Present |
(KB) |
Karl Best, OASIS
OASIS Director of Operations |
Present |
7 |
SJC Positioning re deliverables |
KS |
Stated an opinion that the SJC should not pursue
*developing* either of the three projects proposed (vocabulary, common artifacts
and framework) as a means of meeting the goals outlined in the SJC charter.
The SJC can definitely conceptualize and evangelize these and other relevant
deliverables with TCs or sub groups. That definitely falls under the preview
of the JC. A related item is the Conceptual Model being developed by TAB. |
PG |
If the SJC would be involved in this work or at
least a review of the work and requested that more information be provided? |
KS |
There is a security box in the model and I (Krishna)
plan to develop the OASIS Forum presentation based on that model. Will discuss
with the JC on this in the coming meetings. JC's review would be appreciated. |
KB |
Purpose of the JC is to coordinate and not to
produce any normative deliverables. Anything with normative value should
be done by a TC.
Re Glossary, OASIS registry project could also hold the glossary. The glossary
would exist in the registry and TC's can add their definitions. |
HR |
How would you validate the information ? |
KB |
The registry would track the submittals. So it is possible
to have for example 3 definitions for the same term by three TC's |
PG |
TC's can either accept the definition or offer alternate definitions |
?? |
How can we make suggestions/questions re changes to TC process
? |
KB |
Send queries to Karl |
?? |
One such example is the delay of membership in the JC. The
delay makes sense for TC's but not for JC's |
PG |
Question on majority. For example if there are 11 members,
what is 2/3 majority? |
KB |
Round up. i.e. the majority of an 11 member committee would
be 8 |