OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-bindings
50 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Groups - SCA Bindings Issues (sca-bindings-jira-issues.html) uploaded
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 20 Nov 2009 13:57:39 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 20 Nov 2009 11:31:21 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-05 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-05.doc) modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 20 Nov 2009 11:27:48 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-19 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-19.doc) uploaded
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 20 Nov 2009 11:27:14 -0000
raw chat minutes from Nov 19
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 19 Nov 2009 18:04:45 -0000
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: What is the purpose of definitions/bindingelement (for JMS binding)?
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 19 Nov 2009 17:23:45 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 19 Nov 2009 16:24:18 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 19 Nov 2009 16:22:38 -0000
Issues BINDINGS-88 and BINDINGS-89 - modified JCA binding spec doc
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Nov 2009 16:17:07 -0000
[sca-bindings] please ignore previous NEW ISSUE: no priority rules for JCAbinding URI and elements
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Nov 2009 16:15:01 -0000
NEW ISSUE: no priority rules for JCA binding URI and elements
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Nov 2009 15:37:54 -0000
Issues BINDINGS-88 and BINDINGS-89
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Nov 2009 15:33:20 -0000
Updated proposal for issue BINDINGS-103 second attempt
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Nov 2009 15:20:52 -0000
Updated proposal for issue BINDINGS-103
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Nov 2009 15:12:31 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] Re: Issue BINDINGS-107
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Nov 2009 14:24:39 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] Re: Issue BINDINGS-107
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 19 Nov 2009 06:39:50 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] Re: Issue BINDINGS-107
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Nov 2009 12:57:48 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] Re: Issue BINDINGS-107
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 18 Nov 2009 12:44:34 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 18 Nov 2009 11:33:11 -0000
Re: Issue BINDINGS-107
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Nov 2009 11:02:46 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 18 Nov 2009 10:59:42 -0000
Fw: Requesting LOA from SCA committtees
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Nov 2009 10:51:17 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon cancelled
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 11 Nov 2009 21:57:22 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] Comments on issues BINDINGS-95, 105 and 106 - priorityrules for headers etc.
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 9 Nov 2009 10:31:06 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings-comment] Comments on binding specs
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 6 Nov 2009 14:09:47 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings-comment] Comments on sca-jcabinding-1.1-spec.pdf
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 6 Nov 2009 14:09:43 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 6 Nov 2009 13:55:06 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-10-15 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-10-15.doc) modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 6 Nov 2009 13:51:00 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-05 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-05.doc) uploaded
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 6 Nov 2009 13:47:31 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon cancelled
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 6 Nov 2009 13:44:19 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon cancelled
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 6 Nov 2009 13:42:41 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon cancelled
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 6 Nov 2009 13:30:12 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] Comments on issues BINDINGS-95, 105 and 106 -priority rules for headers etc.
From
Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> on 5 Nov 2009 23:05:16 -0000
Raw chat log of 2009-11-05 telcon
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 5 Nov 2009 18:02:07 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-109: incorrect closing <headers> elementin JMS pseudo-schema
From
Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> on 5 Nov 2009 17:07:50 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-108: No defined behaviour in JMS bindingif resolved operation name not present in interface
From
Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> on 5 Nov 2009 17:00:51 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-107: What is the purpose of definitions/bindingelement?
From
Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> on 5 Nov 2009 16:58:12 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 5 Nov 2009 16:16:35 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 5 Nov 2009 16:09:09 -0000
Comments on issues BINDINGS-95, 105 and 106 - priority rules for headersetc.
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Nov 2009 16:01:01 -0000
NEW ISSUE: incorrect closing <headers> element in JMS pseudo-schema
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Nov 2009 14:51:08 -0000
BINDINGS-94 revised proposal.
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Nov 2009 14:26:34 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 5 Nov 2009 14:08:11 -0000
Re: NEW ISSUE: No defined behaviour in JMS binding if resolved operationnamenot present in interface
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Nov 2009 14:07:27 -0000
Re: NEW ISSUE: no defaults for JMS headers
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Nov 2009 14:06:03 -0000
Proposed resolution for issue BINDINGS-97
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Nov 2009 14:01:12 -0000
NEW ISSUE: No defined behaviour in JMS binding if resolved operation namenot present in interface
From
Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Nov 2009 13:49:22 -0000
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified
From
simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com on 5 Nov 2009 13:48:16 -0000
Re: [sca-bindings] Response to: "Microsoft technical comment: Developinteroperable approach notspecific to SCA for callbacks"
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 5 Nov 2009 07:34:07 -0000
NEW ISSUE: What is the purpose of definitions/binding element?
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 5 Nov 2009 06:23:13 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2