OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
ws-rx
278 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Groups - Latest Editors WSRX Files (Latest WSRX.zip) uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 30 Jun 2006 13:50:06 -0000
Issue i139
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 30 Jun 2006 07:22:18 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] State Tables - First June 27 version
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 30 Jun 2006 01:20:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] State Tables - First June 27 version
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 30 Jun 2006 00:10:08 -0000
preliminary minutes
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 21:38:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposed issues 6/22-29 (with accepted issue numbers)
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 21:09:39 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] List of Bob's NEW issues (really only six) well, ok seven
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 29 Jun 2006 20:10:31 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposed issues 6/22-29
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 19:56:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] FW: [ws-sx] Issue 76: How to reference a specific SC when initiating a session?
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 19:08:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] List of Bob's NEW issues (really only six) well, ok seven
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 19:03:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] List of Bob's NEW issues (really only six) well, ok seven
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 18:58:42 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] State Tables - First June 27 version
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 29 Jun 2006 18:35:50 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Editorial nits in Section 4 wrt using fault names in wsrm spec
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 29 Jun 2006 18:10:49 -0000
RX issue list update - rev 44
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 17:47:02 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] State Tables - First June 27 version
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 17:07:43 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] State Tables - First June 27 version
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 16:51:37 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] List of Bob's NEW issues (really only six) well, ok seven
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 29 Jun 2006 16:51:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] State Tables - First June 27 version
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 29 Jun 2006 16:47:46 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Revised proposal for 122, 123, 124
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 16:47:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] State Tables - First June 27 version
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 16:36:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] List of Bob's NEW issues (really only six) well, ok seven
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 16:23:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue: Extensibility (or not) of the Protocol Elements.
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 16:15:17 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue: Extensibility (or not) of the Protocol Elements.
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 16:09:57 -0000
New proposed issues 6/22-29
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 15:40:00 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Editorial namespace URI is incorrect
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 29 Jun 2006 15:36:09 -0000
Fw: [ws-rx] New Issue: Define the syntax used to refer to elements andattributes
From
Peter Niblett <peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 15:31:47 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Editorial namespace URI is incorrect
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 15:07:43 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Editorial namespace URI is incorrect
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 15:05:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Editorial namespace URI is incorrect
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 14:57:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Editorial namespace URI is incorrect
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 14:49:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] List of Bob's NEW issues (really only six) well, ok seven
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 29 Jun 2006 14:45:44 -0000
[ws-rx] New Issue: Reword the Abstract
From
Peter Niblett <peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 14:41:21 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Editorial namespace URI is incorrect
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 13:49:28 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Editorial namespace URI is incorrect
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 29 Jun 2006 13:46:15 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] List of Bob's NEW issues (really only six) well, ok seven
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 13:40:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] State Tables - First June 27 version
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 12:34:08 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 29 Jun 2006 12:10:37 -0000
cannot take minutes for 6/20 call
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 29 Jun 2006 01:17:37 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 28 Jun 2006 23:45:15 -0000
State Tables, First June 28 version
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 28 Jun 2006 23:00:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] State Tables - First June 27 version
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 28 Jun 2006 22:50:37 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 28 Jun 2006 22:19:10 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 28 Jun 2006 21:02:09 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 28 Jun 2006 19:03:58 -0000
FW: Request for help/information: Comment on Model for Policy (link to WS-Policy)
From
"Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> on 28 Jun 2006 17:48:06 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] State Tables - First June 27 version
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jun 2006 16:18:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] List of Bob's NEW issues (really only six) well, ok seven
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 28 Jun 2006 16:11:07 -0000
List of Bob's NEW issues (really only six)
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 28 Jun 2006 14:18:22 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] New Issue: Extensibility (or not) of the Protocol Elements.
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jun 2006 13:58:37 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] New Issue: Extensibility (or not) of the Protocol Elements.
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jun 2006 13:56:06 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Comments on Editors WSRM #9
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 28 Jun 2006 13:43:24 -0000
New Issue: Reword the Abstract
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Jun 2006 13:37:21 -0000
New Issue: Extensibility (or not) of the Protocol Elements.
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Jun 2006 13:36:54 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Bob's new issues
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jun 2006 13:23:31 -0000
Update for i121 - gil?
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jun 2006 13:20:29 -0000
Bob's new issues
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jun 2006 13:18:49 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Comments on Editors WSRM #9
From
Peter Niblett <peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Jun 2006 11:13:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Revised proposal for 122, 123, 124
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 27 Jun 2006 21:49:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Comments on Editors WSRM #9
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 27 Jun 2006 16:44:58 -0000
State Tables - First June 27 version
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 27 Jun 2006 13:54:29 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Editorial Examples in Apx C lack CloseSequence
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 27 Jun 2006 12:55:30 -0000
NEW ISSUE: design: Implications of Sequence Expiration not specified
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 27 Jun 2006 12:52:23 -0000
Comments on Editors WSRM #9
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Jun 2006 12:02:02 -0000
Groups - MinutesWSRXTC062206 (MinutesWSRX-062206.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 27 Jun 2006 00:09:32 -0000
State Tables revised Second June 26th version based on WD 16 June 26version
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 23:27:28 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Editorial (maybe) RMS MessageNumberRollover behavior unclear
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 22:54:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified,state of sequence is unclear
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 22:02:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Editorial messages have to be received forthem to be examined:
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 21:49:33 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE Editorial,Sec 3.5 Request Acknowledgement text assumes Sequence is known
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 21:40:20 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE Editorial Create Sequence assumes both requestand response are received.
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 21:37:52 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE Editorial Create Sequence assumes both requestand response are received.
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 21:27:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified, state of sequence isunclear
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jun 2006 21:09:49 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE Editorial,Sec 3.5 Request Acknowledgement text assumes Sequence is known
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 26 Jun 2006 21:09:38 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE Editorial Create Sequence assumes both request andresponse are received.
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jun 2006 21:08:10 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Editorial, Sec 3.3 fault response toTerminateSequenceRequest is not specified.
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jun 2006 20:43:34 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE Editorial, Sec 3.5 Request Acknowledgement textassumes Sequence is known
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jun 2006 20:43:31 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Editorial messages have to be received forthem to be examined:
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 26 Jun 2006 19:57:14 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Editorial messages have to be received for them to beexamined: with new highlighting
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 19:55:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified,state of sequence is unclear
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 19:52:36 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Editorial messages have to be received for them to beexamined:
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 18:48:06 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified,state of sequence is unclear
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 18:30:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified,state of sequence is unclear
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 18:05:17 -0000
NEW ISSUE Editorial Create Sequence assumes both request and responseare received.
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 17:56:47 -0000
Issues for discussion on the 6/29 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 26 Jun 2006 17:42:41 -0000
NEW ISSUE Editorial, Sec 3.5 Request Acknowledgement text assumesSequence is known
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 17:33:53 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Editorial,Sec 3.3 fault response to TerminateSequenceRequest is not specified.
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 17:21:20 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified, state of sequenceis unclear
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 26 Jun 2006 17:12:25 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Editorial, add sub-headings to fault descriptions
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 16:48:21 -0000
RE: [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified,state of sequence is unclear REVISED with corrections
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 16:46:30 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified, state of sequence isunclear
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jun 2006 16:20:27 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Rollover underspecified, state of sequence is unclear
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 15:36:26 -0000
Re Action item - State Tables issue 113 proposal
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 15:31:33 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Editorial, add sub-headings to fault descriptions
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 26 Jun 2006 15:24:50 -0000
Draft minutes from 6/22 conf call
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 Jun 2006 21:32:15 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i130 - what does ack interval refer to
From
Peter Niblett <peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com> on 22 Jun 2006 19:24:01 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i130 - what does ack interval refer to
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 22 Jun 2006 18:40:30 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i130 - what does ack interval refer to
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 22 Jun 2006 18:38:19 -0000
Issue proposed-01 Inappropriate Fault destination
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 22 Jun 2006 17:20:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 22 Jun 2006 16:55:52 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i130 - what does ack interval refer to
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 Jun 2006 16:11:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issues 121 - 124 RM + SP Assertions
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 22 Jun 2006 15:57:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 22 Jun 2006 15:11:30 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 22 Jun 2006 15:07:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 22 Jun 2006 15:07:02 -0000
i137 new proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 22 Jun 2006 14:58:39 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 22 Jun 2006 14:57:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issues 121 - 124 RM + SP Assertions
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 22 Jun 2006 13:46:42 -0000
Groups - MinutesWSRX-061506 (MinutesWSRX-061506.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 22 Jun 2006 12:18:28 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i130 - what does ack interval refer to
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 22 Jun 2006 09:51:20 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i130 - what does ack interval refer to
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 22 Jun 2006 03:09:08 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i130 - what does ack interval refer to
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 22 Jun 2006 01:58:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i130 - what does ack interval refer to
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 22 Jun 2006 00:43:16 -0000
i130 - what does ack interval refer to
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 22 Jun 2006 00:24:46 -0000
Revised proposal for 122, 123, 124
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 21 Jun 2006 22:30:37 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issues 121 - 124 RM + SP Assertions
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 21 Jun 2006 20:39:23 -0000
Regrets for June 22nd call
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 21 Jun 2006 19:18:29 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Paul Knight" <paul.knight@nortel.com> on 21 Jun 2006 19:05:43 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issues 121 - 124 RM + SP Assertions
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 21 Jun 2006 16:38:23 -0000
FW: [ws-sx] Issue 76: How to reference a specific SC when initiating a session?
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 21 Jun 2006 12:33:06 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Re [ws-rx] i137: No mechanisms to convey that messagesshould be polled.
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 20 Jun 2006 16:53:14 -0000
Re: Re [ws-rx] i137: No mechanisms to convey that messages shouldbe polled.
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Jun 2006 16:49:02 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Re [ws-rx] i137: No mechanisms to convey that messages shouldbe polled.
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jun 2006 16:33:11 -0000
[Fwd: Re: Listing in the acknowledgement section of the WS-RX spec]
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 20 Jun 2006 16:20:32 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Re [ws-rx] i137: No mechanisms to convey that messagesshould be polled.
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 20 Jun 2006 16:06:32 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 20 Jun 2006 15:56:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 20 Jun 2006 15:37:33 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] FW: [ws-sx] NEW ISSUE: How to reference a specific SCwhen initiating a session? Re. Issues 121, 122, 123
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 20 Jun 2006 15:24:23 -0000
FW: [ws-sx] NEW ISSUE: How to reference a specific SC wheninitiating a session? Re. Issues 121, 122, 123
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 20 Jun 2006 15:20:55 -0000
Re [ws-rx] i137: No mechanisms to convey that messages should bepolled.
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 20 Jun 2006 10:02:53 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE]: No mechanisms to convey that messages shouldbe polled.
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 20 Jun 2006 09:54:08 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 20 Jun 2006 09:47:12 -0000
i134 Update Acknowledgements (not SeqAcks!)
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 20 Jun 2006 09:24:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 19 Jun 2006 15:21:03 -0000
Fw: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 19 Jun 2006 12:36:35 -0000
Re: Fw: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 16 Jun 2006 21:14:18 -0000
Re: Fw: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 16 Jun 2006 20:51:23 -0000
Re: Fw: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 16 Jun 2006 19:52:14 -0000
Re: Fw: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 16 Jun 2006 19:30:14 -0000
Re: Fw: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 16 Jun 2006 17:31:22 -0000
Fw: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 16 Jun 2006 15:18:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 16 Jun 2006 11:14:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 16 Jun 2006 01:26:37 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 16 Jun 2006 01:21:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 16 Jun 2006 01:08:31 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 15 Jun 2006 23:56:43 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Inappropriate Fault destination
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 15 Jun 2006 23:19:56 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 15 Jun 2006 22:37:16 -0000
Regrets for Jun 22 conf-call
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 15 Jun 2006 21:57:37 -0000
Prelim minutes of 6/15 teleconf
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 15 Jun 2006 21:32:01 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 15 Jun 2006 21:30:19 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 15 Jun 2006 21:22:28 -0000
Regrets for Jun 22 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 15 Jun 2006 21:20:58 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 15 Jun 2006 21:18:30 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 15 Jun 2006 21:14:59 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 15 Jun 2006 21:09:29 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0105 editors to determine if issue 10...
From
paul@wso2.com on 15 Jun 2006 20:14:09 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0104 Gill will clarify his proposal f...
From
paul@wso2.com on 15 Jun 2006 20:13:28 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 15 Jun 2006 19:38:39 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 133: Duplicate text in fault section
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 15 Jun 2006 19:01:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Mailing list discussion
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Jun 2006 18:48:09 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Mailing list discussion
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 15 Jun 2006 18:45:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i125
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Jun 2006 18:45:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Mailing list discussion
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 15 Jun 2006 18:39:42 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i125
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 15 Jun 2006 18:34:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] RM SeqID Globally Unique
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 15 Jun 2006 16:51:06 -0000
Mailing list discussion
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 15 Jun 2006 15:02:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New issue
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Jun 2006 00:36:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Consistent use of wsrm: in normative text
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Jun 2006 00:35:47 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] RM SeqID Globally Unique
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Jun 2006 00:35:46 -0000
New proposed issues 6/8 - 6/14
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Jun 2006 00:33:43 -0000
i125
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 14 Jun 2006 17:14:13 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Latest WDs
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jun 2006 16:40:03 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Latest WDs
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 14 Jun 2006 14:57:22 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Latest WDs
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jun 2006 14:42:32 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Latest WDs
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 14 Jun 2006 12:25:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issues 121 - 124 RM + SP Assertions
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 14 Jun 2006 11:46:18 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 13 Jun 2006 16:28:37 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 13 Jun 2006 12:44:06 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 13 Jun 2006 11:36:55 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] comments on WSRMP WD10-diff
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 13 Jun 2006 00:22:21 -0000
comments on WSRMP WD10-diff
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 12 Jun 2006 23:46:55 -0000
Issues 121 - 124 RM + SP Assertions
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 12 Jun 2006 23:30:20 -0000
Latest WDs
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 12 Jun 2006 17:51:41 -0000
posted minutes of 6/8
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 12 Jun 2006 16:54:29 -0000
Groups - Minutes WS-RX 6/8/2006 (MinutesWSRX-060806.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 12 Jun 2006 16:52:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 12 Jun 2006 16:45:50 -0000
Issue 133: Duplicate text in fault section
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 10 Jun 2006 12:47:18 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue: security threats and requirements
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 10 Jun 2006 00:04:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 9 Jun 2006 15:43:38 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue 129: Define "discard"
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 9 Jun 2006 15:42:25 -0000
RX Issue list updated - Rev 42
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 9 Jun 2006 14:56:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Jun 2006 12:40:30 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 9 Jun 2006 12:26:13 -0000
New issue
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 9 Jun 2006 08:45:50 -0000
[NEW ISSUE]: No mechanisms to convey that messages should be polled.
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 9 Jun 2006 06:48:31 -0000
Re: NEW Issue: WD 13 missing most of resolution to issue 106 containedin proposal 4
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 9 Jun 2006 04:47:10 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] WD13 comments
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Jun 2006 04:18:43 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW Issue: WD 13 missing most of resolution to issue 106contained in proposal 4
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Jun 2006 04:08:18 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of WSRX TC Teleconf june 08
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 9 Jun 2006 04:00:25 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of WSRX TC Teleconf june 08
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Jun 2006 03:52:00 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] WD13 comments
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Jun 2006 03:35:42 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] RM SeqID Globally Unique
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Jun 2006 03:23:09 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Consistent use of wsrm: in normative text
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Jun 2006 03:08:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 8 Jun 2006 23:53:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 8 Jun 2006 23:47:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 23:36:22 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 8 Jun 2006 22:36:56 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 22:06:35 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 8 Jun 2006 21:56:41 -0000
Prelim minutes of WSRX TC Teleconf june 08
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 8 Jun 2006 21:43:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 21:34:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 8 Jun 2006 21:19:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 21:14:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 21:03:46 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 20:53:49 -0000
NEW Issue: WD 13 missing most of resolution to issue 106 contained inproposal 4
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 8 Jun 2006 20:50:28 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 8 Jun 2006 20:44:46 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 8 Jun 2006 20:37:10 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW Issue: Change default value of fault uri
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 20:24:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW Issue: Change default value of fault uri
From
Peter Niblett <peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 20:21:32 -0000
Proposed issues: June 1 - 8
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 20:07:18 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal (resending)
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 8 Jun 2006 20:02:02 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 19:54:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 8 Jun 2006 19:51:08 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Make Accept/AcksTo consistent
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 19:28:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 19:26:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 8 Jun 2006 19:21:56 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 19:20:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 19:16:52 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 19:14:47 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 8 Jun 2006 19:14:00 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 8 Jun 2006 19:09:19 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] define unspecified IncompleteSequenceBehavior
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 19:02:24 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Define "discard"
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 18:59:10 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] What does ack interval refer to
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 18:47:23 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Remove sections 1.1 and 1.1.1
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 18:37:56 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] WD13 comments
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 17:57:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 17:45:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
"Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> on 8 Jun 2006 17:15:12 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 8 Jun 2006 14:31:05 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [i089] comments on joint proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 12:09:22 -0000
proposal for i122, i123, and i124
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 11:28:24 -0000
[i089] comments on joint proposal
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 8 Jun 2006 08:01:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] WD13 comments
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 07:36:57 -0000
Issue 126: unclear text regarding wsa:Action
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 05:04:25 -0000
Groups - MinutesWSRX-060106 (MinutesWSRX-060106.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 8 Jun 2006 03:10:16 -0000
WD13 comments
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jun 2006 02:35:16 -0000
NEW Issue: Change default value of fault uri
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 00:35:05 -0000
NEW Issue: Duplicate text in fault section
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 00:31:01 -0000
NEW Issue: Update acknowledgements
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jun 2006 00:27:49 -0000
Reminder - Deadline for raising any new substantive issues is Jun 8th!
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 7 Jun 2006 23:35:04 -0000
RE: June 8 agenda
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 7 Jun 2006 17:44:49 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 7 Jun 2006 17:19:57 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Comments on WS-RM WD 13 and WS-RM Policy WD 9
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 7 Jun 2006 17:04:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Comments on WS-RM WD 13 and WS-RM Policy WD 9
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 7 Jun 2006 15:53:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Comments on WS-RM WD 13 and WS-RM Policy WD 9
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 7 Jun 2006 15:49:20 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Comments on WS-RM WD 13 and WS-RM Policy WD 9
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 7 Jun 2006 14:35:27 -0000
RX Issus list update - Rev 41
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 6 Jun 2006 16:14:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issues for discussion on the 6/8 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 5 Jun 2006 18:35:57 -0000
Issues for discussion on the 6/8 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 5 Jun 2006 18:12:19 -0000
Comments on WS-RM WD 13 and WS-RM Policy WD 9
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 5 Jun 2006 18:09:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 joint proposal - WSDL
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Jun 2006 23:36:35 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 joint proposal - WSDL
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 1 Jun 2006 21:37:58 -0000
Prellim minutes of 6/1 teleconf
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 1 Jun 2006 21:35:02 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 joint proposal - WSDL
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Jun 2006 21:02:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 joint proposal - WSDL
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 1 Jun 2006 20:44:02 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] TC Schedule for discussion today
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 1 Jun 2006 20:00:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] TC Schedule for discussion today
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 1 Jun 2006 19:56:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] TC Schedule for discussion today
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 1 Jun 2006 19:51:40 -0000
TC Schedule for discussion today
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 1 Jun 2006 17:10:43 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 1 Jun 2006 16:55:48 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] phone number
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 1 Jun 2006 16:45:46 -0000
New proposed issues May 25 - 31
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 1 Jun 2006 16:33:56 -0000
phone number
From
Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com> on 1 Jun 2006 15:59:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 joint proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Jun 2006 15:49:43 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 joint proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Jun 2006 15:40:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 joint proposal
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 1 Jun 2006 15:15:56 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 joint proposal
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 1 Jun 2006 04:39:52 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2